Effect of Employees’ Pay-performance Sensitivity on Future Firm Performance: Evidence from State-owned Listed Enterprises in China over 2007-2015

Source:
By:Changzheng Zhang, Gaimei Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jbar.v2i3.924

Abstract:

Taking a balanced panel data consisting of 4365 firm-year observations drawn from the listed state-owned enterprises in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange over 2007-2015 as the research sample, the paper examines the effect of the employees’ pay-performance sensitivity (PPS) on the future firm performance from the two competing perspectives of “incentive effect” and “risk-aversion effect”, adopting the method of multiple regression analysis based on OLS and applying the SPSS23 as the data processing tool. Theoretical analysis and empirical results demonstrate that there is a positive link between the employees’ PPS and the future firm performance. To improve the employees’ PPS can stimulate the engagement of the employees, improve their working quality, enrich their workplace innovative behavior, and further lead to higher future firm performance. Meanwhile, the positive effect of the employees’ PPS on the future firm performance is, on average, lower than that of the top executives’ PPS on the future firm performance. Implications of the findings are provided in the end.

References:

[1] Ataay, A.. Performance Sensitivity of Executive Pay: The Role of Ownership Structure, Board Leadership Structure and Board Characteristic. Ekonomska Istraživanja, 2018, 31(1): 1152-1168. [2] Chen, Ma, B. Li. and N. Dong.. Do Chinese Listed Firms Actively Alter the Design of Pay–performance Sensitivity Following Financial Restatement? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2015, 1-27. [3] Zhang C. Z., Lv Y. F. and Zhang G. L.. CEO Discretion, CEO Tenure and Executive Pay-performance Sensitivity: A Dynamic Model Based on Game Theory. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 2017, 20(3): 701-713. [4] Ivan E. Brick, Oded Palmon, John K. Wald.. Too Much Pay-Performance Sensitivity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, 2012, 94(1): 287-303. [5] Jensen, M. and K. Murphy.. Performance Pay and Top-management Incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 225-264. [6] Conyon, M., S. Peck, L. Read and G. Sadlaer. Econometric Modeling of UK Executive Compensation.. Managerial Finance, 2000, 26(3): 3-20. [7] Yaron Amzaleg, Ofer Azar, Ben-Zion, Uri and Ahron Rosenfeld.. CEO Control, Corporate Performance and Pay-performance Sensitivity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2014, 106(C): 166-174. [8] Tianna Yang and Wenxuan Hou.. Pay-performance Sensitivity and Risk-taking Behaviors: Evidence from Closed-end Funds. Emerging Markets Review, 2016, 29(C): 274-288. [9] Guthrie K, Kwon I and Sokolowsky J.. What Does CEOs’ Pay-for-Performance Reveal About Shareholders’ Attitude Toward Earnings Overstatements? Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, 146(2): 1-32. [10] Kim Kyonghee.. Blockholder Monitoring and the Efficiency of Pay-performance Benchmarking. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2010, 16(5): 748-766. [11] Katarzyna Cieślak.. Agency Conflicts, Executive Compensation Regulations and CEO Pay-performance Sensitivity: Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Management & Governance, 2018, 1-29. [12] Daniel L., McConaughy and Chandra S.. Mishra. Debt, Performance-Based Incentives, and Firm Performance. Financial Management, 1996, 37-51. [13] Abowd John, M.. Does Performance-based Compensation Affect Corporate Performance? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1990, 43(3): 52S-73S. [14] Mehran, Hamid.. Executive Compensation Structure, Ownership, and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 1995, 38(2): 163-84. [15] Chandra S. Mishra, Daniel L. McConaughy and David H.. Gobeli. Effectiveness of CEO Pay-for-Performance. Review of Financial Economics, 2000, l-13. [16] Zhou Jianan and Huang Dengshi.. Risk and Performance Pay Sensitivity in Managerial Compensation: Evidence from Listed Companies in China. Accounting Research, 2006, 44-50. [17] Darius Palia.. The Endogeneity of Managerial Compensation in Firm Valuation: A Solution. The Review of Financial Studies, 2001, 735-764. [18] Babenko I.. Share Repurchases and Pay-Performance Sensitivity of Employee Compensation Contracts. Journal of Finance, 2010, 64(1): 117-150. [19] Zhang Changzheng and Mu Xin.. Study on the Effect of CEO Discretion on the Top Executives' Pay-performance Sensitivity: Based on the Perspective of Technology Intensity. Productivity Research, 2016, 126-130. [20]Nyberg A. J., Pieper J. R. and Trevor C. O.. Pay-for-performance’s Effect on Future Employee Performance: Integrating Psychological and Economic Principles Toward a Contingency Perspective. Journal of Management, 2013, 1753-1783. [21] Aboody D, Johnson N B and Kasznik R.. Employee Stock Options and Future Firm Performance: Evidence from Option Repricing. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 2010, 50(1): 74-92. [22]Mayew W J and Venkatachalam M.. The Power of Voice: Managerial Affective States and Future Firm Performance. Journal of Finance, 2012, 67(1): 1-43. [23]Schaefer S.. The Dependence of Pay-Performance Sensitivity on the Size of the Firm. Review of Economics & Statistics, 2006, 80(3): 436-443. [24] Shi DaLin.. Pay-performance Sensitivity and the Behavior of Corporate Risk-taking. Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, 2015, 87-95. [25]Lee J.. Executive Performance-based remuneration, performance change and board structures. International Journal of Accounting, 2009, 44(2): 138-162. [26] Takao Kato and Katsuyuki Kubo.. CEO Compensation and Firm Performance in Japan: Evidence form New Panel Data on Individual CEO Pay. Japanese Economics, 2006, l-19. [27] Kampkötter P.. Pay-performance Sensitivity of Compensation Contracts for Nonexecutive Employees: The Case of the Financial Crisis. Applied Economics Letters, 2015, 22(9): 734-738. [28] Yu-Ju Chen and Bi-Ying Shih.. An Exploratory Analysis of Cash Holdings and Pay-Performance Sensitivity before and after IFRS Adoption. International Journal of Economic Sciences, 2014, 86-102. [29]Horovitz J. H. and Thietart R. A.. Strategy, Management Design and Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 1982, 3(1): 67-76.