A Study On the Structural Dimension of Middle class Relational Identification in Chinese Context

Updata:01-01-1970

Source:
By:Yunxia SU, Minggui Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jbar.v3i2.1794

Abstract:

Through in-depth interviews, this study makes an exploratory study on the dimension of the middle class relational identification in Chinese context by using the grounded theory. It is mainly composed of 4 dimensions: relational orientation, relational adaptation, relational evaluation and relational development. According to the four dimension model of middle class relational identification, the middle class relational identification in China is the cognitive and behavioral orientation that in the action of achieving a certain purpose, because of the perception of consistence with each other in role cognition and personal cognition, the middle class is willing to unite and trust, respect and understand and coordinate the conflict to adapt to this relationship, and then to form a positive evaluation of the relationship and a sense of belonging and commitment to this relationship. The construction of the structural dimension of middle class relational identification in China is conducive to explaining the endemic phenomena of Chinese middle class.

References:

[1]Chunling Li. Consumption Level and Consumption Mode of Middle Class[J]. Guangdong Social Sciences, 2011, 4: 210-218. [2]Qi Wang, Zhang Wenhong. Stratum Consumption of Urban Class in Social Transformation Period[J]. Chongqing Social Sciences, 2015, 9: 64-71. [3]Pierre Bourdieu (translated by Liu Hui). Distinction: Social Criticism of Judgment [M]. Commercial Press, 2015. [4]Qiang Wu. How is the Middle Class Tempered? Talking from Hart and Negri’s “the Separation of the Masses”[J]. Beijing Cultural Review, 2016, 4: 40-46. [5]Meiqin Wang. Interpretation of Middle Class Theory and Discussion on Its Current Situation [J]. Journal of Nantong University, Social Science Edition, 2008, 24 (3): 111-116. [6]Bernstein B. Class,Codes and Control[M].London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978. [7]Haifeng Qi. Face Problems in Chinese Consumption Behavior[J]. Journal of Hubei University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 36 (1): 120-125. [8]Jianzhong Xia. The Power and Research of Social Stratification, White-collar Groups and their Lifestyles[M]. China Renmin University Press, 2008. [9]Ward M K., Broniarczyk S M. It’s not me, it’s you: How gift giving creates giver identity treat as a function of social closeness[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2011, 38(1): 164-181. [10]Qinghong Yuan, Wanjie Niu, Lin Chen. Review on the Research of Relational Identification in Organizational Context[J]. Soft science, 2017, 8: 47-50. [11]Yueling Huang, Shanshi Liu, Xiaolang Liu. Research Progress and Prospect of Relational Identification[J]. Soft science, 2017, 1:95-100. [12] Ashforth B E., Harrison S H., Corley K G. Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions[J]. Journal of Management, 2008, 34：325-374. [13] Sluss D M., Ashforth B E. Relational Identity and Identification: Defining Ourselves through Work Relationships[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32: 9-32. [14] Hejian Wang. Understanding the Relational Identification of Chinese people[J]. Exploration and Contention, 2007, 12: 32-36. [15] Kark R., Shamir B., Chen G. The Two Faces of Transformational Leadership: Empowerment and Dependency[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88: 246-255. [16] Johnson S A., Ashforth B E. Externalization of Employment in a Service Environment: The Role of Organizational and Customer Identification[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2008, 29: 287-309. [17] Walumbwa F O., Hartnell C A. Understanding Transformational Leadership-employee Performance Links: The Role of Relational Identification and Self-efficacy[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2011, 84: 153-172. [18] S. Zhang, G. Chen, X-P. Chen, et al. Relational versus Collective Identification Within Workgroups: Conceptualization, Measurement Development, and Nomological Network Building[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40: 1700-1731. [19] Jianguo Zhou. Relational strength, Relational Trust or Relational Identification [J]. Social Science Research, 2010, 1:97-102. [20] Runquan Wang. Public Awareness and Public Participation of the Middle Class-a Comparative Analysis Based on the Type of the Middle Class [J]. Jianghan Academic, 2016, 12: 14-21. [21] Xingfa Qi. An Empirical Study on the Political Attitude of the Middle Class in China[J]. Social Science, 2010, 8:3-11. [22] Glaser B G., Strauss A L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research[M]. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter, 1968. [23] Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory[M]. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc, 2008. [24] Jiong Wu. The Influence of Family Power Cost on Family Power Concentration [J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2014, 6: 808-818. [25] Yu Zhu, Jing Tong, Lijun Huang. Review on the Construction of Leadership Identity [J]. Foreign Economy and Management, 2013, 9: 25-34. [26] Guangguo Huang. Confucian Relationism[M]. Peking University Press, 2006. [27] Xingyao Ren, Jianyu Zhu, Qian Liping, Wang Peng. Management of Different Opportunism in Channels: A Study on the Role of Two Dimensions of Contracts and Relationship Norms[J]. Nankai Management Review, 2012, 15 (3): 12-21. [28] Achrol R S., Gundlach G T. Legal and Social Safeguards Against Opportunism in Exchange[J]. Journal of Retailing, 1999, 75(1): 107-124. [29] Lee D Y.. Dawes P L. Guanxi, Trust and Long-Term Orientation in Chinese Business Markets[J]. Journal of International Marketing, 2005, 13(2): 28-56. [30] Ashforth B E. Role Transitions in Organizational Life: an Identity-based Perspective[M]. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2001. [31] Hwang, Kwang-kuo. Face and Favor: The Chinese Power Game[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1987, 92 (1): 944-974.

Tags: