The Long-term Consequences of Ordeals: Evidence from the Chinese Sent-down Movement

Updata:01-01-1970

Source:
By:Shuhong Peng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jesr.v4i4.3618

Abstract:

The Chinese sent-down movement between the mid 1950s to the late 1970s is a suffering period for Chinese sent-down youths. Using the treatment effect model and the ordered probit model, we examine the impact of sent-down experience on sent-down youths’ income and happiness based on the sample of CGSS2003 and CGSS2006. By doing so, we can explore the long-term consequences of one’s suffering experience. The overall sample regression results show that sent-down experience increase 42% of individuals’ income, while reducing 13% of individuals’ happiness. Sub-sample analysis results are robust to the conclusion that the sent-down experience makes a positive impact on income and a negative impact on happiness. This study provides objective evidence for the historical evaluation of sentdown movement, a new interpretation for the Easterlin paradox from the view of personality latitude, new empirical evidence for supporting the new human capital theory, and useful inspiration for the the current grass-roots employment policy for university graduates in China.

References:

[1]Liu, X. M., The History of Chinese Educated Youth: Tide, Contemporary China Publishing House. 2009. [2]Pan, M. X., A Historical Assessment of the “UP to the Mountains, Down to the Villages” Movement, Sociological Research, 2005, 5: 154-181. [3]Jin, D. L. and G. Y., Jin, The Research Collection of Chinese Educated Youths’ Sent-Down Movement, Shanghai Social Sciences Press, 2009. [4]Gu, H. Z., The History of Chinese Educated Youths’ Sent-Down Movement, People’s Daily Press, 2009. [5]Jin, G. Y. and D. L., Jin, The Study on Educated Young People Going and Working in the Countryside from the Documents of Local Chronicles, Contemporary China History Studies, 2015, 22(3): 112-122. [6]Zhou, X. G. and L. R. Hou, Children of the Cultural Revolution: The State and the Life Course in the People’s Republic of China, American Sociological Review, 1999, 64(1): 12-36. DOI: 10.2307/2657275. [7]Xie, Y., Y. Jiang and E. Greenman, Did Send-down Experience Benefit Youth? A Reevaluation of the Social Consequence of Forced Urban-rural Migration during China’s Cultural Revolution, Social Science, 2008,37(2): 686-700. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.08.002. [8]Yang, J. and S. Li, The Impact of Rustication on Sent-down Cohorts’ Income, Frontiers of Economics in China, 2011, 6(2): 290-310. DOI: 10.1007/s11459-011-0133-5. [9]Chen, Y., Z. Y Fan, X. M Gu and L. A Zhou, Arrival of Young Talent: The Send-Down Movement and Rural Education in China, American Economic Review, 2020, 110 (11): 3393-3430. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20191414. [10]Song, S. G. and L. Zheng, The Impact of the Sent-Down Movement on Chinese Women’s Age at First Marriage, Demographic Research, 2016, 34(28): 797-826. [11]Liang, P. H. and J. L. Li, No Regrets Youth? The Long-term Impact of the Sent-Down Experience on Social Trust, World Economic Papers, 2014, 2: 90- 109. [12]de Grip, A., Bosma, H., Willems, D. and van Boxtel, M., Job-Worker Mismatch and Cognitive Decline, Oxford Economic Papers, 2008, 60: 237-253. DOI: 10.1093/oep/gpm023. [13]Baert, S., B. Cockx and D. Verhaest, Overeducation at the Start of the Career: Stepping Stone or Trap? Labour Economics, 2013, 25: 123-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2013.04.013. [14]Nyhus, E. K. and Pons, E., The Effects of Personality on Earnings, Journal of Economic Psychology, 2005, 26(3): 363-384. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2004.07.001. [15]Almlund, M., A. L. Duckworth, J. J. Heckman, and T. Kautz. Personality Psychology and Economics. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, and L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education, 2011, Vol. 4, Chapter 1, 1-181, Elsevier B.V. [16]Heckman, J. J., R. Pinto and P. A. Savelyev, Understanding the Mechanisms through Which an Influential Early Childhood Program Boosted Adult Outcomes. The American Economic Review, 2013, 103(6): 2052-2086. DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.6.2052. [17]Li, X. M. and X. Q., Zeng, The New Human Capital Theory, Economic Perspectives, 2012, 11: 120-126. [18]Easterlin, R. A., Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence. New York: Academic Press, 1974, pp:89-125. [19]Easterlin, R. A., Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1995, 27(1): 35-48. DOI: 10.1016/0167-2681(95)00003-B. [20]Easterlin, R. A., Happiness and Economic Growth: the Evidence, in Glatzer, W. et al.(eds): Global Handbook of Quality of Life: Exploration of Well-Being of Nations and Continents, 2015, pp: 283-299. [21]Clark, A.E., P. Frijters and M.A. Shields, Relative Income, Happiness and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles, Journal of Economic Literature, 2008, 46(1): 95-144. DOI: 10.1257/jel.46.1.95. [22]Zhang, Z. M. and W. L. Mai, Historical Investigation and Reflection on the Sent-Down Movement, Journal of Henan Normal University, 1998, 25(5): 40-44. [23] Maddala, G. S., Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

Tags: