On Formative Evaluation System of College English Grading Teaching
Source: By:jing wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/ret.v3i4.2265
Abstract:To meet the requirements of college English teaching under the new situation and enhance the ability of college students to learn the English independently, modern information technology means is used to have a try and an experiment. English grading teaching is taken as the starting point, due to construct a mixed formative evaluation system, and provide a reference for improving the effects of college English teaching.
References:[1]Office of the Working Group on the Outline of the National Medium- and Long-term Education Reform and Development Plan. The Outline of the national medium- and long-term education reform and development plan (2010-2020). http://old.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/info_list/201407/xxgk_171904.html,2020-04-06. [2]Directing Committee for Foreign Language Teaching in Colleges and Universities of the Ministry of Education. The Guide to College English Teaching (Discussion Paper) [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, China. [3]Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education. College English Teaching Requirements (Trial) [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press ,2004.08. [4]Guo Xi. Fostering Learner Autonomy in College English Teaching by Formative Evaluation [J]. Journal of Xi’an Institute of Foreign Languages ,2004(02):66-68. [5]Brown, J.D. The Elements of Language Curriculum: A Systematic Approach to Program Development [M]. Boston: Heinle & Heilne Publisher, 1995. [6]China’s Educational Modernization 2035. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6052/moe_838/201902/t20190223_370857.html,2020-04-06. [7]Luo Shaoqian. A Study on Formative Evaluation of English Classroom Teaching [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press ,2003. [8]Zhou Fenfen. A Study on College English Grading Teaching [M].Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press, 2013. [9]Boston, Carol. The Concept of Formative Assessment[J]. Practical Assessment: Research & Evaluation,2002(08):59-62.