Teachers are Deprofessionalized when Control of the Curriculum is Taken away from them: Discuss in Relation to High School Teachers in China

Updata:01-01-1970

Source:
By:Dan Cheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/ret.v4i4.3539

Abstract:

In this paper, the writer will use a literature analysis approach to explore the issue of teacher autonomy and professionalism in both centralized and decentralized curriculum models. Through literature analysis, the paper argues that centralized and decentralized curricula each have their own positive and negative effects on teachers' autonomy and professional development. Under the current curriculum model in China, teachers' autonomy and professionalism in curriculum development are both enhanced and limited to some extent. Based on the analysis of the literature, this paper will propose recommendations for enhancing Chinese high school teachers' autonomy and professionalism in curriculum development.

References:

[1] Young, Michael F. D.. Knowledge and Control: New Directions for the Sociology of Education[M]. London: Collier-Macmillan, 1971. [2] Bray, M.. Centralization Versus Decentralization in Educational Administration: Regional Issues[J], Educational Policy, 1991, 5(4): 371-385. [3] Duhou, A.. School-Based Management[M]. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. France,1999. [4] O'Day, A., Smith, S.. Systemic Reform and Educational Opportunity. In S. Fuhr- man (Ed.), Designing coherent education pol icy: Improving the system[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1993:250-312. [5] Kusumaningrum, E., Triwiyanto, T.. Review of centralization and decentralization approaches to curriculum development in Indonesia[J], International Journal of Acdemic Research, 2015. [6] Kelly, A.. The Curriculum: Theory and Practice[M].London: SAGE Publications, 2009. [7] Holt, M. Judgment, Planning and Education Change[M], London: Paul Chapman Publishing,1987a. [8] Au,W.. Teaching under the New Taylorism: Highstakes Testing and the Standardization of the 21st Century Curriculum[J]. Journal of Curriculum Studies,2011,43(1) : 25-45. [9] Hanson, M.. Decentralization and regionalization in educational administration: Comparisons of Venezuela, Colombia and Spain[J]. Comparative Education,1998a, 25(1). [10] Hanson, M.. Strategies of Educational Decentralization: Key Questions and Core Issues. In C. Bjork (Ed.)Educational decentralization: Asian experience and conceptual contributions[M], New York, NY: Routledge,2006:9-25. [11] Bray, M., 1999, ‘Control of Education: Issues and Tensions in Centralization and Decentralization’, in Arnove, R.F. and Torres, C.A. (Eds), Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Global and the Local,Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD. [12] Brennen, M. A. 2002. Centralization Versus Decentralization http://www.soencouragement.org/centralizationvsdecentralization. html. [13] Tan, C.. Dynamics of Change: Decentralized Centralism of Education in Singapore. Education Change,2007, No. 8: 155-168. [14] Guan, C.. Factor Analysis of the Realization of Teachers' Professional Rights under school-based curriculum development[J], Journal of Educational Development, 2015, No.7. [15] McGinn, N. and Welsh, T., 1999. Decentralization of Education: Why, When, What and How[M]? Paris:UNESCO, IIEP. [16] World Bank 2013 Decentralization in education http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/decentralization/English/Issues/Education.html. [17] Hoyle, E.. Teaching: Prestige, Status and Esteem[J].Educational Management Administration and Lead-ership, 2001,29(2): 141. [18] Kennedy, A., 2007. Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Policy and the Discourse of Teacher Professionalism in Scotland[J]. Research papers in Education, 2009, 22(1). [19] Boyt, T., Lusch, R. F. ve Naylor, G.. The Role of Professionalism in Determining Job Satisfaction in professional Services: a Study of Marketing Researchers[J], Journal of Service Research, 2001, 3(4):321-330. [20] David, C.. Professionalism and Ethics in Teaching[M]. London: Taylor & Francis Books Ltd, 2000. [21] MoE. 2002. Circular of the Ministry of Education on Actively Promoting the Reform of the Evaluation and Examination Systems in Primary and Secondary Schools. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A26/ s7054/200212/t20021218_78509.html. [22] Etzioni, A.. The Semi-Professions and Their Organization[M]. New York: Free Press,1969. [23] Leiter, J.. The effects of school control structures on teacher perceptions of autonomy[M]. ERIC,1978. [24] Lieberman, M.. Education as a Profession[M], Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall,1956. [25] Willner, G.. Images of the Future now: Autonomy, Professionalism, and Efficacy[D]. Fordham University,1990. [26] Fay, C., 1990. Teaching and Leading: the Teacher’s Voice. Boston, MA: Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 206 096). [27] Ingersoll, R.M.. The Status of Teaching as a Profession: 1990-91, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, NCES 1997:97-104. [28] Khmelkov, V. T.. Developing professionalism: Effects of school workplace organization on novice teachers’ sense of responsibility and efficacy. Dissertation Abstracts International[C], University of Notre Dame,2000: 61 (04):1639. [29] Pearson, C., Moomaw, W.. The Relationship between Teacher Autonomy and Stress, Work Satisfaction, Empowerment, and Professionalism[J]. Educational Research Quarterly, 2005, 29(1). [30] Xu, J.. National curriculum, Local curriculum and School-based Curriculum: Meanings, Aims and Positions[J]. Educational Research, 2005, No.8. Skilbeck,M.. Readings in School-Based Curriculum Development[M]. London: P. Chapman, 1988. [31] MoE. 2001. General High School Curriculum Plan. https://www.docin.com/p-90569267.html [32] Li, H.. Different Functions of National Curriculum, Local Curriculum and School-Based Curriculum in Education[J]. New Campus, 2011, No. 9. [33] Cheng,Y.. School Effectiveness and School-Based Management[M]. Bristol. PA: Falmer Press,1996. [34] MoE. 2008. Autonomous examination paper design for Gaokao. https://learning.sohu.com/20081028/n260296530.shtml. [35] Cox, H., Wood, R.. Organizational Structure and Professional Alienation: The Case of Public School Teachers[J]. Peabody Journal of Education, 1980,No. 1:1-6. [36] Slavit, D., Nelson, T., and Lesseig, K.. The Teachers’ Role in Developing, opening, and Nurturing an Inclusive STEM-focused School[J]. International Journal of STEM Education, 2016, 3(1). [37] Cui, Y., Xia, Y.. School-based Curriculum Development in China[J]. Peking University Education Review, 2004:2 (3): 34. [38] Gouya, Z., Ghadaksaz L.. New Interpretation of Centralization and Decentralization in Iran[J]. Curriculum Studies Quarterly, 2008:1 (4). [39] Ren, J.. Critique and Transcendence of Models of Primary and Secondary school-based curriculum development[J]. Basic Education Curriculum,2020, No.2. [40] Qi, T.. Between Centralization and Decentralization: Changed Curriculum Governance in Chinese Education after 1986[D]. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tennessee, 2011. [41] Zhang, X..Research on the Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of Students in General High Schools under the Background of New Curriculum[J]. Education and Culture Forum, 2013, No. 2.

Tags: