Non-fragile Dynamic Output Feedback H∞ Control for a Class of Uncertain Switched Systems with Time-varying Delay

Source:
By:Yuning Song, Yuzhong Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jeisr.v3i1.3205

Abstract:

The problem of non-fragile dynamic output feedback H∞ control for a class of uncertain switched systems with time-varying delay is discussed. Firstly, the form of non-fragile dynamic output feedback H∞ controller is given. Under the condition that the upper bound of time delay and the upper bound of delay derivative are limited simultaneously, Lyapunov functional and its corresponding switching rules are constructed by using single Lyapunov function method and convex combination technique; Secondly, we use the inequality lemma to scale the derived Lyapunov functional in order to eliminate the time-varying delay term in the inequality, and then introduce the J-function to obtain a nonlinear matrix inequality that satisfies the H∞ performance index γ, we also employ Schur complement lemma to transform the nonlinear matrix inequality into set of linear matrix inequalities consisting of two linear matrix inequalities, a sufficient condition for the existence of a non-fragile dynamic output feedback H∞ controller and satisfying the H∞ performance index γ is concluded for a class of uncertain switching systems with variable time delay; Finally, a switched system composed of two subsystems is considered and the effectiveness and practicability of the theorem are illustrated by numerical simulation with LMI toolbox. 

References:

[1]Liberzon D, Morse A S. Benchmark problems in stability and design of switched systems [J]. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 1999, 19(5): 59-70. [2]Xie L, de Souza C E. Robust H∞ control for linear systems with norm-bounded time-varying uncertainty. IEEE Trans-actions on Automatic Control, 1992, 37(8): 1188∼1191. [3]Goncalves E N , Palhares R M , Takahashi R. H/sub 2//H/sub /spl infin// filter design for systems with polytope-bounded uncertainty [J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2006, 54(9): 3620-3626. [4]Keel L H, Bhattacharyya S P. Robust, fragile, or optimal? [J]. Automatic Control IEEE Transactions on, 1997, 42(8): 1098-1105. [5]Makila P M. Comments on ‘robust, fragile, or optimal?’ [J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, September 1998, 43 (9): 1265-1268. [6]Dorato P. Non-fragile controller design: an overview [C]. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Philadelphia, June 1998: 2829–2831. [7]Yu L, Chu J, Su H. Robust memoryless H∞ controller design for linear time-delay systems with norm-bounded time-varying uncertainty [J]. Automatica, 1996, 32(12): 1759-1762. [8]Han H C, Chung M J. An LMI approach to H∞ controller design for linear time-delay systems [J]. Automatica, 1997, 33( 4): 737-739. [9]Kokame, H, Kobayashi, Mori T. Robust H. performances for linear delay-differential systems with time-varying uncertainties [J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1998, 43(2):223-226. [10]Yang G H, Wang J L. Non-fragile H∞ output feedback controller design for linear systems [J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement & Control, 2003, 125(1): 117-123. [11]Li L, Jia Y. Non-fragile dynamic output feedback control for linear systems with time-varying delay [J]. IET Control Theory and Applications, 2009, 3(8): 995-1005. [12]Y Wang, H Zhang, D Yang, M Dong. H∞ output feedback control for uncertain systems with time-varying delays [C]. Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2010: 1570–1575. [13]Fernando T L , Phat V N , Trinh K. Output feedback guaranteed cost control of uncertain linear discrete systems with interval time-varying delays [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(3): 1580-1589.