Site Characterization Data Model and GIS-based Tools for Offshore Engineering Projects
Source: By:Matteo Mattioli, Matteo Valenti Pettino, Andrea Foresi, Diego Guidi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/hsme.v4i1.4568
Abstract:Offshore engineering projects require the management of a huge amount of heterogeneous georeferenced data - among others metocean, geophysical, geotechnical, and environmental, which need a Data Model, data visualization and data analytics features on a common geographic basis. A Digital Data Platform (DDP) has been developed on a GIS ambient with the aim to speed up the engineering design process (i.e. minimization of routine operations), and also prevent misalignment of the data originating from different sources from Owner to Suppliers and any potential loss of information. The proposed GIS architecture is composed by two main components: i) the Data Model geodatabase, and ii) the GIS-Model Toolbar add-in. The proposed development represents a step forward on the definition of a common specification and dictionary for offshore project execution overcoming the current bottlenecking and inefficiency on the design phases between the project owner and the engineering contractor. The paper illustrates “what” and “how”, and in particular: i) the geodatabase and Data Model framework, ii) the required parameters to be organized and stored for offshore engineering design, and iii) the widgets implementation (i.e. GIS-based tools). Its application on a case study project with practical examples is presented.
References:[1] Marrannes, M., Collins, K., Piquemal, P., 2012. GIS Support for field development projects: a contractor experience and perspective. OTC 23308, Proceeding of Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas USA. [2] Savazzi, M., Folcini, F., Latronico, M., et al., 2015. Ground Model: A High Value Support to Deepwater Giant Developments Proc. Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition, Ravenna, Italy. [3] Graaff, R.D., Awda, H., Majumdar, D., et al., 2012. Setting a new standard for metocean database. OTC 22023, Proceeding of Offshore Technology Conference, Houston Texas USA. [4] DNV-RP-C205 Environmental Conditions and Envi-26 Hydro Science & Marine Engineering | Volume 04 | Issue 01 | April 2022 ronmental Loads. [5] API RP2MET Derivation of Metocean Design and Operating Conditions. [6] Seabed Survey Data Model. International Association of Oil & Gas Producers https://www.iogp.org/ Geomatics/#2521682-seabed-survey-data-model. [7] Wright, D.J., Blongewicz, M.J., Halpin, P.N., et al., 2007. Arc Marine: GIS for a Blue Planet. ESRI Press: Redlands, CA. [8] Pipeline Open Data Standard (PODS). https://www.pods.org/pods-model/what-is-the-pods-pipeline-datamodel/ [9] Utility and Pipeline Data Model. Esri 2019 Edition. https://ispatialtec.com/content/wp-content/up loads/2020/05/UPDM-2019-Data-Dictionary.pdf [10] Chang, Y.S., Park, H.D., 2004. Development of a web-based geographic information system for the management of borehole and geological data. Computers & Geosciences. 30, 887-897. [11] Sun, C.G., Kim, H.S., Chung, C.K., et al., 2014. Spatial zonations for regional assessment of seismic site effects in the Seoul metropolitan area. Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering. 56, 44-56. [12] Gareth, T.T., Bell, T.G., 2010. Developing a GIS Data Model for Seabed Site Survey Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA. Paper Number: OTC-20829-MS. [13] Priya Divya, B., Dodagoudar, G.R., 2018. An integrated geotechnical database and GIS for 3D subsurface modelling: Application to Chennai City, India. Applied Geomatics. 10, 47-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-018-0202-x [14] Varnell, S., Hogan, P., Broughton, A., et al., 2010. GIS database applications to evaluation of marine geohazards: new Los Angeles country ocean outdall project. OTC 20858, Proceeding of Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas USA. [15] Coastal Engineering Manual, 2002. U.S. Army Corpos of Engineers.