Clinical Efficacy of Mixing Natural Teeth and Implant Supported Denture Sleeve

Source:
By:Rigetu Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jams.v3i1.1403

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the clinical efficacy of Mixing natural teeth and implant supported denture sleeve, and provide reference for clinical treatment. Methods: 46 patients with Molarless in hospital from December 2010 - December 2014 were selected, patients were randomly divided into observer group and control group, two groups of patients were designed and planted natural teeth fixed bridge and natural teeth and implants mixed support sleeve denture, regular follow patients and the surrounding alveolar bone height changes, 5-year cumulative retention rate, clinical efficiency and other indicators. Results: During clinical observation, patients with no obvious symptoms, the use of feel good, no loose superstructure situation. Two groups of patients were 2 cases of patients with implant loosening occurs, the amount of bone resorption annual observation group (0.22 ± 0.10) mm less than the control group (0.24 ± 0.08) mm, but no significant difference (P> 0.05), clinical observation group efficiency (100%) was significantly higher (72.3%) (P <0.05), the observation group study implants 5-year cumulative retention rate was 94.4%. Conclusion: Mixing natural teeth and implant - supported telescopic denture success rate of 100% was observed during the clinical results were satisfactory, with use value.

References:

[1] Yu Chen, Chao Wang, Yuanding Huang. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular multiple tooth loss with telescopic denture supported by implant-natural tooth[J].Journal of Jinan University(Natural Science & Medicine Edition), 2017, 38 (02): 150-154+166. (in Chinese) [2] Friedhelm Heinemann, Torsten Mundt, Christian Schwahn and Istabrak Hasan, Bone loss of immediately loaded implants with implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported fi xed maxillary prostheses [J], Biomed Tech 2012; 57:33–38. [3] Steven M. Davis, DDS, MSc, * Alexandra B. Plonka, Risks and Benefits of Connecting an Implant and Natural Tooth [J], IMPLANT DENTISTRY / VOLUME 23, NUMBER 3 2014. [4] Tian Qin, ​​ Guofeng Wu. Posterior occlusion of implant denture-natural tooth mixed dentition[J].Journal of Practical Stomatology,2015,33(5):733-737. (in Chinese) [5]. Yina Lin, Aiguo Chen, Changying Yu. Clinical evaluation of two kinds of natural tooth-implant combined support fixed bridge[J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2017, 22(03): 128-130. (in Chinese) [6] Hans-Joachim Nickenig, Survival and Complication Rates of Combined Tooth- Implant-Supported Fixed and Removable Partial Dentures. Volume 21, Number 2, 2008. [7] Shaowu Chen, Wei Xiao, Zhiyong Li, et al. Effects of different structures on the upper part of the mandibular free end denture stress distribution[J]. Journal of Practical Stomatology,2012,28(3):294-297. (in Chinese) [8]Guangping Xie, Ye Chen, Dongwei Han. Stress Analysis of Natural Dental and Implant Supporting Sleeve Crown Fixed Bridge[J].Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2007(01):64-67. (in Chinese)