Gaining Insight into Mechanisms of Nonphotochemical Quenching of Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii via the Observation of Dark-induced State Transitions
Source: By:Author(s)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jbr.v6i1.6089
Abstract:Photosynthetic organisms are usually exposed to fluctuating light, and therefore they evolved mechanisms enabling fast acclimation to changing light conditions. Among them, two important ones are energy-dependent quenching of excited chlorophyll (qE) and state transitions (ST). qE is a photoprotective mechanism regulated by pH gradient across thylakoid membranes, in which excessive energy is dissipated as heat. ST are rearrangements of antenna systems regulated by the phosphorylation of LHC II complexes. Both of these mechanisms result in changes in NPQ parameters. In the present article, changes of NPQ in the green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii were evaluated in the dark period, after various lengths of actinic light exposure, and after the application of the thiol reducing reagent dithiotreitol and the cyt b6f inhibitor 2' ,4' -dinitrophenyl ether of 2-iodo-4-nitro-thymol. The impact of the length of actinic light exposure on xanthophyll cycle progression in C. reinhardtii was also analysed. The obtained results enabled us to gain more insight into the nonphotochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in model organism C. reinhardtii, i.e. the role of zeaxanthin-dependent quenching and chlororespiration-induced pH gradient, and the inhibitory action of tested compounds on state transitions in this species.
References:[1] Erickson, E., Wakao, S., Niyogi, K.K., 2015. Light stress and photoprotection in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Journal. 82(3), 449–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12825 [2] Müller, P., Li, X.P., Niyogi, K.K., 2001. Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy. Plant Physiology. 125(4), 1558–1566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.125.4.1558 [3] Niyogi, K.K., Li, X.P., Rosenberg, V., et al., 2005. Is PsbS the site of non-photochemical quenching in photosynthesis? Journal of Experimental Botany. 56(411), 375–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri056 [4] Holt, N.E., Fleming, G.R., Niyogi, K.K., 2004. Toward an understanding of the mechanism of nonphotochemical quenching in green plants. Biochemistry. 43(26), 8281–8289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0494020 [5] Bonente, G., Passarini, F., Cazzaniga, S., et al., 2008. The occurrence of the psbS gene product in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and in other photosynthetic organisms and its correlation with energy quenching. Proceedings of the Photochemistry and Photobiology. 84(6), 1359–1370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00456.x [6] Bonente, G., Ballottari, M., Truong, T.B., et al., 2011. Analysis of LhcSR3, a protein essential for feedback de-excitation in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. PLoS Biology. 9(1), e1000577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000577 [7] Bonente, G., Pippa, S., Castellano, S., et al., 2012. Acclimation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to different growth irradiances. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 287(8), 5833–5847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.304279 [8] Finazzi, G., Johnson, G.N., Dall' Osto, L., et al., 2006. Nonphotochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biochemistry. 45(5), 1490–1498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0521588 [9] Quaas, T., Berteotti, S., Ballottari, M., et al., 2015. Non-photochemical quenching and xanthophyll cycle activities in six green algal species suggest mechanistic differences in the process of excess energy dissipation. Journal of Plant Physiology. 172, 92–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2014.07.023 [10] Finazzi, G., 2005. The central role of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in revealing the mechanism of state transitions. Journal of Experimental Botany. 56(411), 383–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh230 [11] Allen, J.F., 2003. State transitions—A question of balance. Science. 299(5612), 1530–1532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082833 [12] Ünlü, C., Drop, B., Croce, R., et al., 2014. State transitions in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strongly modulate the functional size of photosystem II but not of photosystem I. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 111(9), 3460–3465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1319164111 [13] Cariti, F., Chazaux, M., Lefebvre-Legendre, L., et al., 2020. Regulation of light harvesting in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii two protein phosphatases are involved in state transitions. Plant Physiology. 183(4), 1749–1764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.20.00384 [14] Alric, J., Lavergne, J., Rappaport, F., 2010. Redox and ATP control of photosynthetic cyclic electron flow in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (I) aerobic conditions. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Bioenergetics. 1797(1), 44–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.07.009 [15] Nowicka, B., 2020. Practical aspects of the measurements of non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching in green microalgae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii using Open FluorCam. Physiologia Plantarum. 168(3), 617–629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13003 [16] Beardall, J., Quigg, A., Raven, J.A., 2003. Oxygen consumption: photorespiration and chlororespiration. Photosynthesis in algae. Springer: Dordrecht. pp. 157–181. [17] Bennoun, P., 1982. Evidence for a respiratory chain in the chloroplast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 79(14), 4352–4356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.14.4352 [18] Johnson, X., Alric, J., 2012. Interaction between starch breakdown, acetate assimilation, and photosynthetic cyclic electron flow in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 287(31), 26445–26452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.370205 [19] Maxwell, K., Johnson, G.N., 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany. 51(345), 659–668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659 [20] Lichtenthaler, H.K., 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology. 148(C), 350–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1 [21] Nowicka, B., Kruk, J., 2012. Plastoquinol is more active than α-tocopherol in singlet oxygen scavenging during high light stress of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Bioenergetics. 1817(3), 389–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.12.002 [22] Nowicka, B., Strzalka, W., Strzalka, K., 2009. New transgenic line of Arabidopsis thaliana with partly disabled zeaxanthin epoxidase activity displays changed carotenoid composition, xanthophyll cycle activity and non-photochemical quenching kinetics. Journal of Plant Physiology. 166(10), 1045–1056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2008.12.010 [23] Latowski, D., Kuczyńska, P., Strzałka, K., 2011. Xanthophyll cycle—a mechanism protecting plants against oxidative stress. Redox Report. 16(2), 78–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/174329211X13020951739938 [24] Troiano, J.M., Perozeni, F., Moya, R., et al., 2021. Identification of distinct pH- and zeaxanthin-dependent quenching in LHCSR3 from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. ELife. 10, e60383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60383 [25] Peltier, G., Cournac, L., 2002. Chlororespiration. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 53, 523–550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135242 [26] Jiang, C.D., Gao, H.Y., Zou, Q., et al., 2004. Inhibition of photosynthesis by shift in the balance of excitation energy distribution between photosystems in dithiothreitol treated soybean leaves. Photosynthetica. 42(3), 409–415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHOT.0000046160.18482.91 [27] Wu, J., Rong, L., Lin, W., et al., 2021. Functional redox links between lumen thiol oxidoreductase1 and serine/threonine-protein kinase STN7. Plant Physiology. 186(2), 964–976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/PLPHYS/KIAB091 [28] Wunder, T., Liu, Q., Aseeva, E., et al., 2013. Control of STN7 transcript abundance and transient STN7 dimerisation are involved in the regulation of STN7 activity. Planta. 237(2), 541–558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-012-1775-y [29] Rintamäki, E., Martinsuo, P., Pursiheimo, S., et al., 2000. Cooperative regulation of light-harvesting complex II phosphorylation via the plastoquinol and ferredoxin-thioredoxin system in chloroplasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 97(21), 11644–11649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.180054297 [30] Lemeille, S., Willig, A., Depège-Fargeix, N., et al., 2009. Analysis of the chloroplast protein kinase Stt7 during state transitions. PLoS Biology. 7(3), e1000045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000045 [31] Shapiguzov, A., Chai, X., Fucile, G., et al., 2016. Activation of the Stt7/STN7 Kinase through dynamic interactions with the cytochrome b6f complex. Plant Physiology. 171(1), 82–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01893 [32] Zito, F., Finazzi, G., Delosme, R., et al., 1999. The Qo site of cytochrome b6f complexes controls the activation of the LHCII kinase. EMBO Journal. 18(11), 2961–2969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.11.2961 [33] Roberts, A.G., Bowman, M.K., Kramer, D.M., 2004. The inhibitor DBMIB provides insight into the functional architecture of the Qo site in the cytochrome b6f complex. Biochemistry. 43(24), 7707–7716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bi049521f [34] Finazzi, G., Zito, F., Barbagallo, R.P., 2001. Contrasted effects of inhibitors of cytochrome b6f complex on state transitions in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: The role of Qo site occupancy in LHCII kinase activation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 276(13), 9770–9774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M010092200 [35] Nellaepalli, S., Mekala, N.R., Zsiros, O., et al., 2011. Moderate heat stress induces state transitions in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Bioenergetics. 1807(9), 1177–1184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.05.016 [36] Fitzpatrick, D., Aro, E.M., Tiwari, A.A., 2020. A commonly used photosynthetic inhibitor fails to block electron flow to photosystem I in intact systems. Frontiers in Plant Science. 11, 382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00382