Quality Decisions Based on Time between Events Data Analysis

Source:
By:Author(s)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v6i1.5034

Abstract:

Good decisions (Quality Decisions) depend on scientific analysis of data. Data are collected, generally, in two ways: 1) one sample of suitable size, 2) subsequent samples, at regular intervals of time. Often the data are considered normally distributed. This is wrong because the data must be analysed according to their distribution: Decisions are different. In several cases the data are exponentially distributed: we see how to scientifically deal with Control Charts (CC) to decide; this is opposite to what gives the T Charts that are claimed to be a good method for dealing with “rare events”: The Minitab Software (19 & 20 & 21) for “T Charts” is considered. The author will compare some methods, found in the literature with the author’s Theory RIT (Reliability Integral Theory): We will see various cases found in the literature. Classical Shewhart Control Charts and the TBE (Time Between Events) Control Charts have been considered: it appears that with RIT the future decisions will be both sounder and cheaper, for data is exponentially distributed. The novelty of the paper is in the scientific way of dealing with the Control Charts and their Control Limits, both with normally distributed data and with exponentially distributed data. In this way, a lot of wrong published papers on “Time Between Events” are to be discarded, even if their authors claim “We used Standard Statistical methods, typical in the vast literature of similar papers”. The author had to self-cite because it seems the only one that has been fighting for years for “Papers Quality”; he humbly asked the readers to inform him if some people did the same

References:

[1]Dovoedo, Y.H., Chakraborti, S., 2011. Boxplot-based phase I control charts for time between events. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 28(1), 123-130. [2]Kumar, N., Rakitzis, A.C., Chakraborti, S., etal., 2022. Statistical design of ATS-unbiased charts with runs rules for monitoring exponential time between events. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods. DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2022.2092143. [3]Jones, L.A., Champ, C.W., 2002. Phase I control charts for times between events. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 18(10), 479- 488. [4]Fang, Y.Y., Khoo, M.B., Lee, M.H., 2013. Synthetic-type control charts for time-betweenevents monitoring. PLoS One. 8(6), e65440. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065440. [5]Kumar, N., Chakraborti, S., 2021. Improved phase I control charts for monitoring times between events[Internet] [Accessed 2021 Mar 20]. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com. [6]Dovoedo, Y.H., 2021. Contribution to outlier detection methods: Some Theory and Applications [Internet] [Accessed 2021 Mar 20]. Available from: https://ir.ua.edu› handle. [7]Liu, J., Xie, M., Sharma, P., 2006. A comparative study of exponential time between event charts. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management. 3(3), 347-359. DOI: 10.1080/16843703.2006.11673120. [8]Sim, C.H., Gan, F.F., Chang, T.C., 2005. Outlier labeling with boxplot procedures. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 100(470), 642-652. DOI: 10.1198/016214504000001466. [9]Frisén, M., 2007. Properties and use of the shewhart method and followers. Sequential Analysis. 26, 171-193. [10]Woodall, W.H., 2000. Controversies and contradictions in statistical process control. Journal of Quality Technology. 32(4), 341-350. [11]Kittlitz, R.G., 1999. Transforming the exponential for SPC applications. Journal of Quality Technology. 31(3), 301-308. DOI: 10.1080/00224065.1999.11979928. [12]Schilling, E.G., Nelson, P.R., 1976. The effect of non-normality on the control limits of X charts. Journal of Quality Technology. 8, 183-188. DOI: 10.1080/00224065.1976.11980743. [13]Woodall, W.H., 2006. The use of control charts in health-care and public health surveillance. Journal of Quality Technology. 38(2), 89-104. [14]Xie, M., Goh, T.N., Kuralmani, V., 2002. Statistical models and control charts for high-quality processes. Springer New York, NY: New York. [15]Xie, M., Goh, T.N., Kuralmani, V., 2002. Statistical models and control charts for high-quality processes, Chapter 3. Springer New York, NY: New York. [16]Xie, M., Goh, T.N., Ranjan, P., 2002. Some effective control chart procedures for reliability monitoring. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 77(2), 143-150. DOI: 10.1016/S0951- 8320(02)00041-8. [17]Xie, M., 2006. Some Statistical Models for the Monitoring of High-Quality Processes. Boston, Chapter 16. Springer: Berlin. Chapter 16. [18]Zhang, C.W., Xie, M., Goh, T.N., 2005. Economic design of exponential charts for time between events monitoring. International Journal of Production Research. 43, 5019-5032. DOI: 10.1080/00207540500219387. [19]Zhang, C.W., Xie, M., Goh, T.N., 2006. Design of exponential control charts using a sequential sampling scheme. IIE Transactions. 38, 1105- 1116. DOI: 10.1080/07408170600728905. [20]Zhang, H.Y., Xie, M., Goh, T.N., et al., 2011. Economic design of time-between-events control chart system. Computers and Industrial Engineering. 60(4), 485-492. DOI: 10.1016/ j.cie.2010.11.008. [21]Santiago, E., Smith, J., 2012. Control charts based on the exponential distribution. Quality Engineering. 25(2), 85-96. DOI: 10.1080/ 08982112.2012.740646. [22]Khan, N., Aslam, M., 2009. Design of an EWMA adaptive control chart using MDS sampling. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems. 22(3), 535-555. DOI: 10.1080/09720510.2018.1564206. [23]Balamurali, S., Aslam, M., 2019. Variable batchsize attribute control chart. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems. 22(6), 1037-1048.DOI: 10.1080/09720510.2018.1564207. [24]Allen, T., 2006. Introduction to engineering statistics and six-sigma. Springer: Berlin. [25]Galetto, F., 2020. Six sigma: Hoax against quality ignorant professionals fond of money and not of quality minitab wrong t charts. HAL Archives Ouvert. [26]Montgomery, D.C., 1996. Introduction to statistical quality control. Wiley & Sons: New York. [27]Galetto, F., 1999. GIQA the golden integral quality approach: From management of quality to quality of management. Total Quality Management (TQM). 10(1). [28]Galetto, F., 1989. Quality of methods for quality is important. EOQC Conference, Vienna; 2013 Nov; Austria, Vienna. [29]Galetto, F., 1998. Quality education on quality for future managers. 1st Conference on TQM for HEI (Higher Education Institutions); Toulon, France. [30]Galetto, F., 2000. Quality education for professors teaching quality to future managers. 3rd Conference on TQM for HEI (Higher Education Institutions); Derby, UK. [31]Galetto, F., 2001. Looking for quality in “quality books”. 4th Conference on TQM for HEI (Higher Education Institutions); Mons, Belgium. [32]Galetto, F., 2002. Business excellence quality and control charts. 7th TQM Conference Verona, Italy. [33]Galetto, F., 2004. Six sigma approach and testing. ICEM12 – 12th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics; Bari Politecnico, Italy. [34]Galetto, F., 2006. Quality education and quality papers. IPSI 2006; Marbella, Spain. [35]Galetto, F., 2006. Quality Education versus peer review. IPSI 2006; Montenegro. [36]Galetto, F., 2006. Does peer review assure quality of papers and education? 8th Conference on TQM for HEI (Higher Education Institutions); Paisley, Scotland. [37]Galetto, F., 2010. The Pentalogy Beyond, 9th Conference on TQM for HEI (Higher Education Institutions); Verona, Italy. [38]Galetto, F., 2012. Six Sigma: Help or hoax for quality? 11th Conference on TQM for HEI (Higher Education Institutions); Israel. [39]Galetto, F., 2015. Hope for the Future: Overcoming the deep ignorance on the CI (Confidence Intervals) and on the DOE (Design of Experiments). Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. 3(3), 70-95. DOI: 10.11648/j.sjams.20150303.12. [40]Galetto, F., 2015. Management versus science: peer-reviewers do not know the subject they have to analyse. Journal of Investment and Management. 4(6), 319-329. DOI: 10.11648/ j.jim.20150406.15. [41]Galetto, F., 2015. The first step to science innovation: Down to the basics. Journal of Investment and Management. 4(6), 319-329. DOI: 10.11648/j.jim.20150406.15. [42]Shewhart, W.A., 1931. Economic control of quality of manufactured products. Martino Fine Books: Connecticut, USA. [43]Shewhart, W.A., 1936. Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control. Graduate School, The Department of Agriculture: Washington. pp. 155. [44]Deming, W.E., 1986. Out of the crisis. Cambridge University Press: UK. [45]Deming, W.E., 1997. The new economics for industry, government, education. Cambridge University Press: UK. [46]Juran, J.M., 1998. Quality control handbook (5th ed). McGraw-Hill Inc.,US: New York. [47]Galetto, F., 2000. Quality. Some statistical methods for Managers. CUSL; Torino, Italy. [48]Galetto, F., 2010. Reliability management for managers. CLUT; Torino, Italy. [49]Galetto, F., 2015. Maintenance and Reliability. CLUT; Torino, Italy. [50]Galetto, F., 2016. Reliability and maintenance, scientific methods, practical approach. 1. Scholars’ Press: Atlanta, GA. [51]Galetto, F., 2016. Reliability and maintenance, scientific methods, practical approach. 2. Scholars’ Press: Atlanta, GA. [52]Galetto, F., 2016. Design of experiments and decisions, scientific methods, practical approach. Scholars’ Press: Atlanta, GA. [53]Galetto, F., 2017. The six sigma hoax versus the versus the golden integral quality approach legacy. Scholars’ Press: Atlanta, GA. [54]Galetto, F., 2018. Quality and quality function deployment, a scientific analysis. Lambert Academic Publishing: Germany. [55]Galetto, F., 2022. Reliability for maintenance, maintenance for availability [Internet]. Available from: www.tabedizioni.it. [56]Galetto, F., 2019. Statistical Process Management. ELIVA press: Republic of Moldova.