Promotion Standards and Practices across the Business Cycle: Evidence from Korea

Source:
By:Vladimir Hlasny

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jsbe.v5i2.9

Abstract:

Korean employers notoriously practice seniority-based personnel management, rather than one prioritizing workers’ skills or performance, and this has changed only slowly amid the evolving business landscape and advancing labor standards. This study contributes to understanding this phenomenon by assessing Korean firms’ promotion criteria and practices over the past decade across distinct phases of industry business cycles, and between the economy’s primary and secondary sectors. Primary-sector firms are shown to be less likely than secondary-sector firms to base their promotion decisions on the analysis of workers’ achievements and colleague ratings, but rather on their performance of core job duties. Primary-sector firms have more advancement steps within their management ranks, and longer wait time until promotion at all ranks. Secondary-sector firms are flatter hierarchically, featuring shorter time to promotion at all ranks and fewer advancement steps, but also a lower fraction of promotions based on special merit. Firms’ promotion practices change over the business cycle. During expansionary years, the hierarchical dispersion of workers within organizations widens, particularly among primary-sector firms, with more workers remaining as regular staff but more managers promoted to senior management. As firms recruit more regular staff, years to promotion to managerial positions, and the count of advancement steps increase. Business expansion induces firms to streamline promotions to management based on colleague ratings subject to lesser review of workers’ own achievements. Over the past decade, promotions by special merit have receded while those by colleague ratings have gone up. Firms are thus apparently not transitioning toward merit- and achievement-based promotions, and continue relying on subjective colleague ratings and job-content analysis in their stagnant hierarchical structures. This has implications for workers and for policymakers tasked with ushering in more inclusive, objective and meritocratic personnel management practices.

References:

Koo, H., 2007. The changing faces of inequality in South Korea in the age of globalization. Korean Studies. 31, 1-18. Chang, J., 2009. The Korean gender regime and nature of the welfare state, In Debate on the Nature of the Korean Welfare State, 2nd ed. M. Jung, Ed.; Seoul: Ingan-gwa-bokji. pp. 493-534. Cumings, B., 2005. Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York: W.W.Norton. Rowley, Ch., 2012. The changing nature of management and culture in South Korea. Managing Across Diverse Cultures in East Asia, Malcolm Warner, Ed.; London: Routledge. Hussain, T., 2006. Chaebol face three fundamental challenges. Korea Herald. Kim, S., Briscoe, D.R., 1997. Globalization and a new human resource policy in Korea: transformation to a performance-based HRM. Employee Relations. 19(4), 298-308. Kim, D.O., Park, S.S., 1997. Changing patterns of pay system in Japan and Korea: from seniority to performance. International Journal of Employment Studies. 5(2), 117-134. Bae, J., Rowley, Ch., 2001. The impact of globalization on HRM: the case of South Korea. Journal of World Business. 36(4), 402-428. Pucik, V., Lim, J.Ch., 2001. Transforming human resource management in a Korean chaebol: a case study of Samsung. Asia Pacific Business Review. 7(4), 137-160. Bae, J., 2012. Self-fulfilling processes at a global level: The evolution of human resource management practices in Korea (1987-2007). Management Learning. 43(5). Hlasny, V., 2008. Regulatory climate change. Korea Policy Review. (1), 53-58. Schauer, J., 2018. Labor market duality in Korea. International Monetary Fund Working Paper 126. Hlasny, V., 2014. A Hierarchical process of applicant screening by Korean employers. Journal of Labor Research. 35(3), 246-270. Hlasny, V., Jeung, H.J., 2014. Applicant screening practices at Korean firms: evidence from interviews of personnel officers. Asia Women. 30(3), 57-84. Hlasny, V., 2020. How COVID-19 wreaked havoc on South Korea’s labor market. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2020/08/how-covid-19-wreakedhavoc-on-south-koreas-labor-market. Ministry of Employment and Labor (MOEL), 2006. Korean answers to questionnaire on labor market duality in Korea, Seoul, mimeo. Grubb, D., Lee, J.K., Tergeist, P., 2007. Addressing labour market duality in Korea. OECD Social Employment and Migration Working Paper #61, OECD Publishing. Hlasny, V., 2020. Decomposition of income gaps across socioeconomic groups: the case of six Asian countries. Journal of Income Distribution. 28(1). Hlasny, V., 2017. Labor market rigidities and social inequality in Korea: the role of legal, economic and social governance, On Korea academic paper series 10, Washington: Korea Economic Institute of America. Hlasny, V., 2021. Labor market developments and policies in Korea, Peninsula. https://keia.org/the-peninsula/2021-in-review-labor-market-developments-and-policies-in-korea/. Ra, Y.S., Shim, K.W., 2009. The Korean case study: past experience and new trends in training policies. World Bank SP Discussion Paper 0931. Lazear, E.P., Rosen, S., 1981. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy. 89(5), 841-864. Dobson, J.R., 1988. Seniority promotion systems: a review. Personnel Review. 17(5), 19-28. Baker, G., Holmstrom, B., 1995. Internal labor markets: too many theories, too few facts. American Economic Review. 85(2), 255-259. Lawrence, P.R., Lorsch, J.W., 1967. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly. 12(1), 1-47. Phelan, S.E., Lin, Zh., 2001. Promotion systems and organizational performance: a contingency model. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory. 7(5), 207-232. Cho, J., Lee, K.Y., Lee, J., 2011. Dismissal law and human resource management in SMEs: Lessons from Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 49(1), 105-123. Horak, S., 2017. The informal dimension of human resource management in Korea: Yongo, recruiting practices and career progression. International Journal of Human Resource Management. 28(10), 1409- 1432. Chase, I.D., 1991. Vacancy chains. Annual Review of Sociology. 17, 133-154. Chamberlain, G., 1980. Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Review of Economic Studies. 47, 225-238. Lancaster, T., 2000. The incidental parameter problem since 1948. Journal of Econometrics. 95, 391- 413. Hlasny, V., 2014. Economic determinants of applicant screening practices: an empirical analysis of the Human Capital Corporate Panel, KRIVET 4th HCCP Conference Proceedings. pp. 852-875. https://docviewer.nanet.go.kr/reader/c7c8ff51859e475ba356ad0edae36b25. Kang, M.S., Pan, H.F., Ha, H.Y., 2017. An empirical test of replacement costs of turnover using human capital corporate panel in Korea. Asia Pacific Business Review. 24(3), 312-329. Jolliffe, I.T., 2005. Principal Component Analysis, 2nd ed., New York: Springer-Verlag. Ferrari, P.A., Annoni, P., Barbiero, A., et al., 2011. An imputation method for categorical variables with application to nonlinear principal component analysis. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 55(7), 2410-2420. Jones, R.S., Urasawa, S., 2012. Promoting social cohesion in Korea. OECD Economics Department working paper 963, OECD Publishing. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k97gkdfjqf3-en Cappelli, P., 2003. Career Jobs are Dead. St. Louis: Webster University Press. Debroux, P., Harry, W., Hayashi, S., et al., 2018. Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan: issues and trends in HRM. Handbook of Research on Comparative Human Resource Management, 2nd ed. (ch. 31), Chris Brewster, Wolfgang Mayrhofer and Elaine Farndale, Eds. pp. 577-596. Froese, F., Sekiguchi, J., Maharjan, T., et al., 2018. Human resource management in Japan and South Korea. in Routledge Handbook of Human Resource Management in Asia (ch. 15). Fang Lee Cooke and Sunghoon Kim, Eds.; London: Routledge. Cooke, F.L., Schuler, R., Varma, A., 2020. Human resource management research and practice in Asia: past, present and future. Human Resource Management Review. 30(4), 100778.