Ways of Representation of Main Suggestive Strategies and Tactics in Law Discourse

Updata:01-01-1970

Source:
By:Veronika Viktorovna Katermina

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jpr.v1i2.667

Abstract:

This article is devoted to the research of the mechanisms of suggestive influence represented in professional layers – prosecutors and attorneys – speech within the English law discourse on the material of a particular witness examination part of the court procedure. Some basic suggestive strategies and tactics used in this step and brief characteristics of their intentiality and ways of representation are presented. It is stated that suggestion as a means of persuasion and manipulation on a psyche is possible only due to the existence of a certain mechanism which gives a person an opportunity to perceive the suggested influences and reflect them.  The authors suppose that the analysis of an effective manipulation of professional opponents – a plaintiff and a defendant (some basic suggestive-psychological algorithms used at the opening statement as well as suggestive strategies, tactics and methods applied) might considerably enhance the perspectives of studying characteristic features of law discourse thus allowing to get closer to the understanding of how a person’s brain works as well as the nature of consciousness and subconsciousness together with the anthropocentric approach aimed at realization of manipulation/suggestion within the situation of an institutional communication.

References:

[1] Andreas S., Folkner Ch.. [M]. NLP. New technologies of achieving success. Sofiya: Gelios, 2001. [2] Barhudarov L. S.. [M]. Language and translation. Moscow: International relations, 1975. [3] Bekhterev V. M.. [M]. Selected works on Social Psychology. Moscow: Nauka, 1994. [4] Behndler R.. [M]. Use your brain to change yourself. Saint-Petersburg: Petersburg, 1994. [5] Behndler R., Grinder D.. [M]. Transformation. Neurolinguistic programming and the structure of hypnosis. Moscow: Nauka, 1999. [6] Erikson M.. [M]. Hypnoticrealities: usage of clinical hypnosis and the variant of indirect suggestion. Moscow: Nauka, 1999. [7] Goncharov V. A.. [J]. Dynamics of interpersonal relations in artificially reorganized small group. Psychology of the XXIst century. 2001: 143–145.NO VOLUME! [8] Gumboldt von V.. [M]. Selected works on linguistics. Moscow: Progress, 1984. [9] Kertscher Tom Wis. fighting Dassey release in 'Making a Murderer' case / Tom Kertscher. USA Today. URL: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2016/11/14/brendan-dassey-ordered-released/93804596/ [10] Kevin Grasha Tensing trial: What you need to know / Kevin Grasha. USA Today. URL: http://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2016/10/24/tensing-trial-everything-you-need-know/92464944. [11] Krushevskij N.. [M]. Essays of the science about Earth. Moscow: Nauka, 2011. [12] Mistrial declared in case of South Carolina officer who shot Walter Scott after traffic stop. Washington Post. URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/12/05/mistrial-declared-in-case-of-south-carolina-officer-who-shot-walter-scott-after-traffic-stop/ [13] Myshlyaev S. K.. [M]. Hypnosis. Personal influence? Saint-Petersburg: Fraternity, 1994. [14] Pavlov I. P.. [M]. Complete works. Moscow: Academy of Sciences, 1951. [15] Rollan R.. [M]. Collection of works in 9 volumes. Moscow: Pravda, 1983. [16] Svyadoshch A. M., Romen A. S.. [J]. Application of the autogenic training in psychotherapeutical practice. Technique of autohypnosis. Karaganda, 1966: 16–25. NO VOLUME! [17] Transcript of proceedings / McMartin Preschool Abuse Trial.  Famous trials, 1987, 90. URL: http://www.famous–trials.com/mcmartin. [18] Transcript of proceedings // Butler vs. Lubbock. URL: https://fas.org/butler/sentence.html. [19] Vandries Zh.. [M]. Language. Linguistic introduction to the history. Moscow: State Socio-economic Publishing House, 1937. [20] Vundt V.. [M]. Problems of psychology of peoples. Saint-Petersburg: Peterburg, 2001.

Tags: