Habitat Suitability Index Modelling for Bluebull (Boselaphus tragocamelus) in Pench Tiger Reserve, M.P. India

Updata:01-01-1970

Source:
By:Orus Ilyas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jzr.v3i3.3544

Abstract:
The habitats for the wild animals are shrinking due to the clearance of forests for agriculture and industrialization. The idea of wildlife conservation begins with the identification of their acceptable habitat. Since this crucial information helps in the development and maintenance of the protected areas. The requirement of habitat varies with different landscapes.The bluebull (Boselaphus tragocamelus) is Asia’s largest antelope,widespread throughout the northern Indian subcontinent. Peter Simon Pallasin (1766) described it as the only member of the genus Boselaphus.The Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972 lists it as a Schedule III animal, while the IUCN lists it as Least Concern (LC). Our goal was to design a habitat appropriateness model for blue bull so that it could reduce the conflict with farming community due to crop damage. Model will be develop using RS & GIS technique to protect the species inside the Pench Tiger Reserve (77° 55’ W to 79° 35’ E and 21° 08’ S to 22° 00’ N) the central highlands of India. The satellite data from LANDSAT-8 of 4th April 2015, Path- 144,Row- 45, with a ground resolution of 30 meters, were collected from the USGS website. This satellite image was then transferred in image format to ERDAS IMAGINE 2013 for further analysis. The data from satellites were gathered and analysed. The purpose of the field survey was to gather information about the presence of various ungulates. A ground truthing exercise was also carried out. For data processing and GIS analysis,ERDAS IMAGINE 13 and Arc GIS 10 were used. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used Factors were identified who were influencing the spatial distribution of the species for conservation planning. The linear additive model was used for HSI. The results show that 242 km2 (29.48 percent) of Pench Tiger Reserve forest was recognized to be highly suitable for bluebull, while 196 km2 (23.87 percent) was moderately suitable,231 km2 (28.14 percent) was suitable, 109 km2 (13.28 percent) was least suitable, and about 43 km2 (5.249 percent) of PTR was completely avoided by bluebull.
References:

[1] Lecis R, Norris K. Habitat correlates of distribution and local population decline of the endemic Sardinian new Euproctus platycephalus. Biological Conservation 2003; Vol.115:303-317. [2] De Wulf, RR, Mac Kinnon JR, Cai WS, Geocarto International. 1988; 41-50. [3] Davis FW, Stoms D M, Estes JE, Scott JM. An information systems approach to the preservation of biological diversity. International journal of Geographic Information Systems 1990; 4: 55-78. [4] Kushwaha, SPS, Roy PS, Geospatial technology for wildlife habitat evaluation. Tropical Ecology. 2002; 43: 137-150. [5] Kushwaha SPS, Khan A, Habib B, Quadri A, Singh A, Evaluation of sambar and muntjac habitats using geostatistical modeling. Current Science 2004; 86(10):390_ 1400. [6] Zarri AA, Rahmani AR, Singh A, Kushwaha SPS. Habitat suitability assessment for the endangered Nilgiri Laughingthrush: a multiple logistic regression approach. 2008 Current Science 94:1487-1494. [7] Kushwaha.SPS, Roy PS, Azeem A, Boruah P, Lahan P. Land area change and Rhino habitat suitability analysis in Kaziranga National Park, Assam.Tigerpaper. 2000; XXVII:2. [8] Hizrel AH, Helfer V. Metral F. Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species. Ecological Modeling 2001; 145: 111-121. [9] Park CR. Lee WS. Devolopment of a GIS-based habitat suitability model for wild boar Sus scrofa in the Mt. Baekwoonsan region, Korea. Mammal Study.2003; 28: 17-21. [10] Roy PS, Ravan SA, Rajadnya N, Das KK Jain A. Singh’ S. Habitat suitability analysis of Nemorhaedus goral- a remote sensing and geographic information system approach. Current Science 1995; 69: 685-691. [11] Imam E, Kushwaha SPS Singh A, Evalutation of suitable tiger habitat in Chandoli National Park India using Multiple logistic regression, Ecologogical Modelling 2009; 220:3621-3629. [12] Sankar K, Qureshi Q, Pasha MKS, Areendran G. Ecology of gaur(Bos gaurus) in Pench Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh.Final report, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun. 2001; pp.124. [13] Areendran G, A Study on Vegetation Ecology in Pench Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh with Reference to Gaur (Bos gaurus), thesis PhD, Saurashtra University. 2007. [14] Basu, S. Evaluation of impact of landscape change on large Mammal Habitat in Pench Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, India.PhD Thesis. Saurashtra University. 2012 pg 218. [15] Heinanen S, Von Numers M. Diversity and Distributions. 2009; 15 266-279. [16] Store R, Jokimaki J. Ecological Modeling. 2003; 169 (1) 1-15. [17] Ranganathan J, Chan KMA, Karanth K. Smith, JLD..Biological Conservation. 2008; Vol. 141 67-77. [18] Lilles TM, Kiefer RW. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation,” 4th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken 2000. [19] Saaty TL. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York 1980. [20] Xiong Y, Contento AL, Nguyen PQ, Bassham DC. Degradation of oxidized proteins by autophagy during oxidative stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007 Jan;143(1):291-9. DOI: 10.1104/pp.106.092106. Epub 2006 Nov 10. PMID:17098847; PMCID: PMC1761971. [21] Saaty TL. Vargas LG. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1991. [22] Saaty TL. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1977; Vol. 15 234-281. [23] Dai FC, Lee CF, Zhang XH, .Engineering Geology. 2001, 61 257-271. [24] Eastman JR, Jin W, Kyem PAK, Toledano J, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote and Sensing. 1995;61 539-547. [25] Wang XD, Zhong XH, Liu SZ, Liu JG, Wang ZY, Li MH. Journal of Arid Environments. 2008; 72, 1929-1939.

Tags: