From Small Activities to Big Life: The Dilemma and Implementation Path to Discipline Integration in Middle Schools Pointing to Qualities

Updata:01-01-1970

Source:
By:Zizhen Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/ret.v4i3.3412

Abstract:

The cross-integration of middle school disciplines is the current trend and the need of education, but it is faced with difficulties in practice. The article mainly adopts the observation method and literature research method, analyzes the dilemma with three aspects, and put forward the progressive four-step implementation path. Respectively, schools and teachers can set up teaching objectives pointing to the core qualities of disciplines firstly, organize teaching materials to carry out small interdisciplinary activities in class secondly, then integrate teachers to launch big project-based learning and interdisciplinary activities, finally create comprehensive curriculum pointing to comprehensive qualities.

References:

[1] Du Xiaoli. The shift of the value orientation focus of educational research: from “subject based” to “problem based”—Taking Harvard education review as an example [J]. Educational theory and practice, 2007 (23): 7-11. [2] Wang Chunhui. From “subject oriented” to “education oriented” -- comparison and Enlightenment of new and old high school English Curriculum Standards[J]. Teaching monthly,middle school edition (Teaching Reference), 2018 (04): 3-7. [3] Xu Yanjuan. Holographic reading course: from subject oriented to “whole person” development [J]. People’s education,2016 (24): 46-48. [4] Yong Jun. Let mathematics teaching return to subject standard [J]. Chinese Journal of education, 2019 (02): 105. [5] Ministry of Education, Basic Education Curriculum Reform Outline (Trial) [EB/OL]. [2001-06-08]. http://old.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s8001/201404/xxgk_167343.html. [6] Zhang Tingkai. Curriculum integration in the perspective of different subjects—the new trend of the new round of compulsory education curriculum reform in China [J]. Curriculum∙Teaching materials∙Teaching methods, 2002 (04): 15-20. [7] Yang Rumeng. Cross-integration teaching model of Chinese in high school [D]. Xinyang Normal College,2020. [8] Wu Guozhen. Comprehensive curriculum innovation and teachers’ professional growth [M]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press, 2013.01: 6. [9] Susan M. Drake, Rebecca C. burns. Translated by Liao Shan, Huang Jinghui, Pan Wen. Development of comprehensive curriculum [M], 2007.01: 2. [10] Beane J A.Curriculum integration:Designing the Core of Democratic Education[M].Teachers College Press,1997: 8. [11] Liu Denghui. The guidance framework, implementation path and reference of American comprehensive curriculum reform[J]. Comparative education research,2019,41 (12): 94-100.

Tags: