The Immutability of Online Course in Art Education

Updata:01-01-1970

Source:
By:jie fan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/ret.v4i4.3590

Abstract:

The signifier and signified of symbol representation in art works can generate and reflect reality. However, it can never produce the absolute truth. This paper mainly discusses the relationship between immutability with arbitrariness, sociality, and continuity in art education, both online and in outline. Overall, it is recommended that practical art teaching should be guided by artistic achievements. In addition, we clarify immutability of network teaching mode in art education, and recommend exploration of conscious, independent and self-discipline modes.

References:

[1] Liang Jiu. Art criticism [M]. Jiangxi fine arts publishing house, January 2008, page 25. [2] [US]Vera Zolberg. Constructing a Sociology of the Arts[M].Yilin Press.2018, page 110. [3] Howard S. Friedman, Miriam W Schustack . Personality: Glassic Theories and Modern Research [M].China Machine Press, April 2011, page 205. [4] [US] Edmund Burke Feldman. Philosophy of Art Education[M]. Zhejiang People's fine arts publishing house, August 2019, P. 105. [5] Yu Qiuyu. Art creation [M]. Chang Jiang literature and Art Publishing House, August 2013, page 173. [6] [RUS] Sergei ikovenko, Traiz Art, Inventive Problem Solving Theory [M].Yanshan University Press,2020,page 233. [7]Wei yanli, Qian zhaoyang, Zhang yidan. Interactive Form of New Media Art under Recognition Mode [J].Hundred Schools in Arts. 2019, (1). [8] [GER] Karl Theodor Jaspers. Was ist Erziehung? [M]. Shanghai Joint Publishing, 1991,page 2.

Tags: