Impact of Commercial Floodplain Aquaculture on Common-pool Resource Dependent Community

Source:
By:Tanzina Nazia, Afia Fahmida Daizy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jfsr.v3i2.3371

Abstract:

Aquaculture in pond and floodplain was accelerated in Bangladesh in the 1990s as a means of better production and income which was backed by the donor agencies, NGOs, and the government. Currently, the commercial actors are involved in the aquaculture systems due to the availability of production technologies and inputs. This paper aims to explore how the commercialization and privatization of floodplain aquaculture become the cause of the sufferings of the natural resource-dependent people and biodiversity loss in the floodplains. Now, Influential people hold control of the common pool floodplains and restricted the access of the Small-Scale Fishers (SSF) to manage the aquaculture. Our findings suggest that the SSF, for whom the seasonal floodplains were an important source of livelihood, their livelihood has been destroyed and overall wellbeing have been negatively affected. Besides that, lending enough evidence to the increased inequality, a new group of poor has emerged. Because instead of ensuring the welfare of SSF, Bangladesh government has leased the floodplain lands to the powerful rich people. In addition to growing inequalities, natural resource degradation has welcomed social vulnerabilities. However, no development initiative will ever be sustainable and effective if the existing socio-ecological setting is not considered. Bangladesh government should take robust attempts to revisit fisheries policies to ensure livelihood resilience of fisheries resource-dependent community by managing the access rights of the common pool resources.

References:

[1] P. Sultana and P. M. Thompson, “Community Fishery Management Implications for Food Security and Livelihoods,” p. 11, 2000. [2] K. M. e-Jahan, M. Ahmed, and B. Belton, “The impacts of aquaculture development on food security: lessons from Bangladesh,” Aquac. Res., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 481-495, Mar. 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02337.x. [3] X. Irz, J. R. Stevenson, A. Tanoy, P. Villarante, and P. Morissens, “The Equity and Poverty Impacts of Aquaculture: Insights from the Philippines,” Dev. Policy Rev., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 495-516, Jul. 2007. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00382.x. [4] K. A. T. Rick Gregory, “Common waters and private lands: Distributional impacts of floodplain aquaculture in Bangladesh,” Food Policy, vol. 33, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.04.001. [5] “YEARBOOK OF FISHERIES STATISTICS OF BANGLADESH 2017-18,” Department of Fisheries Bangladesh Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock Government of the People’s Republic of Banglades, 35, Dec. 2018. [6] M. Safiur Rahman et al., “Assessment of heavy metals contamination in selected tropical marine fish species in Bangladesh and their impact on human health,” Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag., vol. 11, p. 100210, May 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.enmm.2019.100210. [7] S. Freed et al., “Maintaining Diversity of Integrated Rice and Fish Production Confers Adaptability of Food Systems to Global Change,” Front. Sustain. Food Syst., vol. 4, p. 576179, Nov. 2020. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.576179. [8] J. Ferguson, Anti-Politics Machine. University of Minnesota Press, 1994. [9] C. Béné and N. Obirih-Opareh, “Social and economic impacts of agricultural productivity intensification: The case of brush park fisheries in Lake Volta,” Agric. Syst., vol. 102, no. 1-3, pp. 1-10, Oct. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2009.06.001. [10] S. Sala and S. Bocchi, “Green revolution impacts in Bangladesh: exploring adaptation pathways for enhancing national food security,” Clim. Dev., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 238-255, Jul. 2014. DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2014.886988. [11] “FAOSTAT.” http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed Jun. 15, 2021). [12] P. M. Thompson, A. K. M. Firoz Khan, and P. Sultana, “COMPARISON OF AQUACULTURE EXTENSION IMPACTS IN BANGLADESH,” Aquac. Econ. Manag., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 15-31, Jan. 2006. DOI: 10.1080/13657300500315786. [13] A. B. M. Mahfuzul Haque, L. E. Visser, and M. M. Dey, Community based fish culture in the public and private floodplains of Bangladesh. 2015. Accessed: Jun. 15, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://edepot.wur.nl/363993. [14] M. Billah, M. Kader, A. A. M. Siddiqui, S. Shoeb, and R. Khan, “Studies on fisheries status and socio-economic condition of fishing community in Bhatiary coastal area Chittagong, Bangladesh,” J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., p. 9, 2018. [15] H. Trung Thanh, P. Tschakert, and M. R. Hipsey,“Moving up or going under? Differential livelihood trajectories in coastal communities in Vietnam,” World Dev., vol. 138, p. 105219, Feb. 2021.6.28. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105219. [16] A. K. Deb, “‘Voices of the Fishantry’: Learning on the Livelihood Dynamics from Bangladesh,” p. 351. [17] I. Mihajlov et al., “Arsenic contamination of Bangladesh aquifers exacerbated by clay layers,” Nat. Commun., vol. 11, p. 2244, May 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16104-z. [18] A. B. M. M. Haque and M. M. Dey, “Impacts of community-based fish culture in seasonal floodplains on income, food security and employment in Bangladesh,” Food Secur., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 25-38, Feb. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s12571-016-0629-z. [19] A. K. E. Haque, M. N. Murty, and P. Shyamsundar, Environmental Valuation in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511843938. [20] P. Sultana and P. Thompson, “Livelihoods in Bangladesh Floodplains,” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science, Jun. 28, 2017. https://oxfordre.com/naturalhazardscience/ view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.001.0001/acrefore-9780199389407-e-258 (accessed Jun. 15, 2021). [21] M. Andreasson, “DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES,”p. 139. [22] A. Billah and A. Khan, “Gas Extraction and Its Implication for Economic Sustainability of Bangladesh,” Bangladesh Dev. Stud., vol. 27, pp. 1-34, Jan. 2001. DOI: 10.2307/40795634. [23] A. Agrawal, “Sustainable Governance of Common-Pool Resources: Context, Methods, and Politics,” Annu Rev Anthr., vol. 20, pp. 243-62, Oct. 2003. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093112. [24] A. Agrawal, “Common Property Institutions and Sustainable Governance of Resources,” World Dev., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1649-1672, Oct. 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00063-8. [25] O. Rajee and A. T. K. Mun, “Impact of aquaculture on the livelihoods and food security of rural communities,” p. 6. [26] S. Thilsted, N. Roos, and N. Hassan, The role of small indigenous fish species in food and nutrition security in Bangladesh, vol. 20. 1996. [27] M. M. Dey, M. Prein, A. B. M. Mahfuzul Haque, P. Sultana, N. Cong Dan, and N. Van Hao, “ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF COMMUNITY-BASED FISH CULTURE IN SEASONALLY FLOODED RICE FIELDS IN BANGLADESH AND VIETNAM,” Aquac. Econ. Manag., vol. 9, no. 1-2, pp. 65-88, Jan. 2005. DOI: 10.1080/13657300590961591. [28] J. Novak Colwell, “Socio-economic impacts of a closed fishing season on resource-dependent stakeholders in Tamil Nadu, India: Differences in income and expenditure effects by occupational group,” Mar. Policy, vol. in press, Mar. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.10.026. [29] A. Balmford, “Economic Reasons for Conserving Wild Nature,” Science, vol. 297, no. 5583, pp. 950-953, Aug. 2002. DOI: 10.1126/science.1073947.