Comparative Analysis of Three Types of Fishing Gear Marking for Anchored Fish Aggregating Devices in Purse Seine Fishery in Thai Waters

Source:
By:Watcharapong Chumchuen, Jirawut Kumpirod, Sahaphat Duerasor, Chanont Nualsri, Thassanee Suppapruek, Kraison Krueajun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jfsr.v4i1.4446

Abstract:

Anchored fish aggregating devices (AFADs) have been widely used for fishing in Thai waters. However, abandoned, lost, and discarded fishing gears (ALDFGs), including lost AFADs, may cause environmental impacts. Fishing gear marking (FGM) is considered as a tool to help identification of ALDFGs. The main objective of this study is to compare the durability represented by the percentage of remaining condition (R-value) of three material types of FGM applied for AFADs, i.e., stainless steel (SS), colored acrylic (CA), and polypropylene (PP). This study was carried out using 50 AFADs deployed in the Gulf of Thailand (GOT) and the Andaman Sea (ANS) between July and October 2020 in cooperation with 10 fishers. The AFADs were deployed in similar habitat (bottom depth and type) between the GOT and the ANS. The three material types of FGM were assumed to be sufficiently durable to last for the lifespan of the AFADs in both the GOT and the ANS (within 2 months and 3.5 months, respectively) though some FGMs in the ANS were detached from cable ties or broken before AFADs were lost. The loss of AFADs and FGMs was mainly caused by adverse weather condition (rough sea). Only data from the ANS was included in comparative analysis due to the insufficient variance data obtained from the GOT. The analysis revealed that SS had the higher durability than CA and PP when the AFADs lasted for less than 3.5 months. As a result of our study, some recommendations were made. For example, the cable ties can be replaced by ropes or threads to improve the installation method. This study serves as a basis to develop FGM and to support responsible fisheries. Beneficiaries of the study include fisheries policy makers, managers, and fishers.

References:

[1] Yingyuad, W., Chanrachkij, I., 2010. Purse seine fisheries of Thailand, Training Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center: Thailand. pp.69 [2] Hallier, J.P., 1995. Tropical tuna fishing with purse seine and log. FAO Infofish International. 4, 53–58. [3] Lopez, J., Moreno, G., Sancristobal, I., et al., 2014. Evolution and current state of the technology of echo-sounder buoys used by Spanish tropical tuna purse seiners in the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific Oceans. Fisheries Research. 155, 127–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.02.033 [4] Taquet, M., 2013. Fish aggregating devices (FADs): Good or bad fishing tools? A question of scale and knowledge. Aquatic Living Resources. 26, 25–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2013043 [5] Karama, K.S., Matsushita, Y., 2019. A review on anchored fish aggregating devices (aFADs) as a tool to promote and manage artisanal fisheries. Journal of Fisheries Engineering. 56, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18903/fisheng.56.1_1 [6] Beverly, S., Griffiths, D., Lee, R., 2012. Anchored fish aggregating devices for artisanal fisheries in South and Southeast Asia: benefits and risks, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Thailand. pp.37 [7] Kumamoto, S., 2013. Substance of fish aggregating devices. Journal of Fisheries Engineering. 49, 199–202. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18903/fisheng.49.3_199 [8] Widyatmoko, A.C., Hardesty, B.D., Wilcox, C., 2021. Detecting anchored fish aggregating devices (AFADs) and estimating use patterns from vessel tracking data in small-scale fisheries. Scientific Reports. 11, 17909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97227-1 [9] Yusfiandayani, R., Baskoro, M.S., Monintja, D., 2015. Impact of fish aggregating device on sustainable capture fisheries, In: Setyobudi, R.H., Burlakovs, J., Mel, M., et al. (Eds.), The 1st International Symposium on Aquatic Product Processing 2013. Knowledge Publishing Services: Indonesia, pp. 224–237. DOI: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/kls.v1i0.107 [10] Boonjorn, N., Srichanngam, S., Auksonphaob, A., 2018. Purse seine fisheries in the middle Gulf of Thailand, Department of Fisheries: Thailand. pp.28 [11] GESAMP, 2021. Sea-based sources of marine litter. Retrieved from the Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection. http://www.gesamp.org/site/assets/files/2213/rs108e.pdf (Assessed 7 February 2022). [12] Balderson, S.D., Martin, L.E.C., 2015. Environmental impacts and causation of ‘beached’ drifting fish aggregating devices around Seychelles Islands: a preliminary report on data collected by Island Conservation Society, In: The 11th Working Party on Ecosystems and Bycatch. Retrieved from Indian Ocean Tuna Commission. https://www.iotc.org/sites/default/files/documents/2015/09/IOTC-2015-WPEB11-39_-_FAD_beaching_Seychelles.pdf. (Assessed 7 February 2022). [13] Davies, T., Curnick, D., Barde, J., et al., 2017. Potential environmental impacts caused by beaching of drifting fish aggregating devices and identification of management solutions and uncertainties, In: The 1st IOTC Ad Hoc Working Group on FADs. Retrieved from Indian Ocean Tuna Commission. https://www.iotc.org/documents/potential-environmental-impacts-caused-beaching-dfads-and-identification-management (Assessed 7 February 2022). [14] Escalle, L., Phillips, J.S., Brownjohn, M., et al., 2019. Environmental versus operational drivers of drifting FAD beaching in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. Scientific Reports. 9, 14005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50364-0 [15] UN, 2017. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017. Retrieved from United Nations Statistics Division. https://ggim.un.org/documents/a_res_71_313.pdf. (Assessed 7 February 2022). [16] FAO, 2011. Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries Special Edition. Retrieved from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/i1900e/i1900e.pdf. (Assessed 21 February 2021). [17] DOF, 2019. Notification of the Department of Fisheries on the criteria for preparation of marking of fishing gears and fishing equipments, B.E. 2562. Retrieved from Ratchakitcha. http://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2562/E/027/T_0012.PDF. (Assessed 8 February 2022). [18] FAO, 2019. Voluntary guidelines on the marking of fishing gear, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Italy. 72 pp. [19] FAO, 2016. Report of the expert consultation on the marking of fishing gear. Retrieved from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5729e. (Assessed 2 April 2021). [20] He, P., Suuronen, P., 2018. Technologies for the marking of fishing gear to identify gear components entangled on marine animals and to reduce abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 129, 253–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.02.033 [21] Dixon, C., Satria, F., Wudianto, et al., 2018. Gear marking pilot study in Indonesian small-scale gillnet fisheries with reference to FAO’s draft Guidelines on the Marking of Fishing Gear, In: The 33th Session of Committee on Fisheries. Retrieved from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/3/ BU654en/bu654en.pdf. (Assessed 2 April 2021). [22] Edwin, L., Antony, V.T., Das, P.H.D., et al., 2020. Fishing gear marking: A technique for traceability of lost gears. FishTech Reporter. 6(1), 1–3. [23] Chumchuen, W., Krueajun, K., 2021. Fishing activities and viewpoints on fishing gear marking of gillnet fishers in small-scale and industrial fishery in the Gulf of Thailand. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 172, 112827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112827 [24] Gilman, E., Bigler, B., Muller, B., et al., 2018. Stakeholder views on methods to identify ownership and track the position of drifting fish aggregating devices used by tuna purse seine fisheries with reference to FAO’s draft guidelines on the marking of fishing gear. Retrieved from Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission. https://meetings.wcpfc.int/node/10648. (Assessed 7 February 2022). [25] Janekitkosol, W., Somchanakij, H., Eiamsa-ard, M., et al., 2003. Strategic review of the fishery situation in Thailand, In: Silvestre, G., Garces, L., Stobutzki, I., et al. (Eds.), WorldFish Center Conference Proceedings 67. pp. 915–956. [26] DOF, 2018. Notification of the Department of Fisheries on the determination of fishing license application form, fishing license, fishing license transfer application form, substitute fishing license application form, and required documents for the application, B.E. Retrieved from Ratchakitcha. http://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2561/E/010/73.PDF. (Assessed 7 February 2022). [27] DOF, 2018. Notification of the Department of Fisheries on the Criteria and Procedures for Fishing Vessel Marking for Commercial Fishing Vessels in Thai Waters, B.E. 2561. Retrieved from Ratchakitcha. http://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2561/E/054/21.PDF. (Assessed 7 February 2022). [28] DOF, 2020. Notification of the Department of Fisheries on the Criteria and Procedures for Fishing Vessel Marking for Commercial Fishing Vessels in Thai Waters (Issue 2), B.E. 2563. Retrieved from Ratchakitcha. http://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2563/E/077/T_0014.PDF. (Assessed 7 February 2022). [29] Hawkins, A.D., 2019. The importance of involving stakeholders and scientists in the management of marine fisheries. Journal of Fisheries Science. 1, 31–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jfsr.v1i1.917 [30] MD, 2020. Number and name of Thai vessels on white list. Retrieved from Marine Department. https://whitelist.md.go.th/ship. (Accessed 21 Decamber 2020). [31] DOF, 2020. E-License. Retrieved from Department of Fisheries. https://elicense.fisheries.go.th. (accessed 11 February 2020). [32] Kai, T., 2013. An Introduction of Tuna Fishery on Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) in Okinawa. Journal of Fisheries Engineering. 49, 203–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18903/fisheng.49.3_203 [33] Shainee, M., Leira, B.J., 2011. On the cause of premature FAD loss in the Maldives. Fisheries Research. 109, 42–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2011.01.015