Morphometric Characteristics and Reproductive Performance of Pasundan Cattle in the North Prianganese and Southern South Coast Region

Source:
By:Mas Yedi Sumaryadi, Euis Nia Setiawati, Agus Triyanto, Vony Armelia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jzr.v3i2.3087

Abstract:

This study aims to determine the morphometric characteristics and reproductive performance of Pasundan cows which are extensively reared on smallholder farms in the coastal areas of the south (Garut, Cianjur, and Sukabumi) and North Priangan (Bogor, Purwakarta, and Sumedang). This research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Production characterization was carried out using a simple method, namely by measuring the body surface including shoulder height, chest circumference,body length, and bodyweight of Pasundan attle. Meanwhile, the reproductive characteristics discuss puberty, service per conception (S / C),conception rate (CR), calving rate,postpartum estrus, postpartum mating,days open (DO), calving interval (CI), calving birth weight, calving rate,and calves weight growth. Data were collected by survey, and the location was determined by purposive sampling in the area of the seed source with the largest population and the random sampling of livestock was determined purposively as many as 30 Pasundan cows from each region.Data were analyzed using quantitative descriptive analysis. The results showed that the morphometric characteristics of Pasundan cattle included mean shoulder height of 123.0 0 ± 3.06a cm VS 121.34 ± 2.82a in males and 110.34 ± 2.78 vs 108.00 ± 2.14a in females. Body length 115.74 ± 3.30 cm VS 115.34 ± 2.97acm in males and 112.67 ± 2.97cm VS 109.67 ± 1.82 cm in females. Chest circumference 145.67 ± 2.97cm VS 142.67 ± 2.67cm bulls and 136.00 ± 2.95cm VS 131.00 ± 2.92cm in females, Bodyweight 268.0 ± 17.00 kg VS 246.00 ± 7.00a for males and 215.0 ± 15.00 kg VS 194.00 ± 54.00kg in females. As for reproductive characteristics,it shows puberty of 20-24 months.,S/ C 1.4 - 1.6, Conception rate 65-70%, calving rate 62.5-65%, Postpartum Estrus 50-60 days, postpartum mating 72-104 days, day -open 94-126 days and a calving interval of 12-14 months. Calves' birth weight was 18.0 - 18.5 kg and daily body weight gain ranged from 0.48 to 0.50 kg. It was concluded that the morphometric characteristics and reproductive performance of Pasundan cattle in the Pesisir Selatan area were better than North Priangan.

References:

[1]Handiwirawan E, RR Noor, Muladno, L Schuler.2003. The use of HEL9 and INRA035 microsatellites as specific markers for Bali cattle. Arch Tierz, Dummerstorf. 46(6): 503-512. [2]Indrijani H, Arifin J, Anang A. 2013. Proposal for The Establishment of Pasundan Cattle Clumps.Bandung. Livestock Office of West Java Province. [3]Arifin, J. 2009. Empowerment of Cattle Farmers in South Garut Coast through Knowledge Introduction in Genetic Quality Improvement. Proceedings of the National Sustainable Seminar. Faculty of Animal Husbandry UNPAD. Bandung. [4]Livestock Office of West Java Province 2014. Report of Beef Cattle Population in West Java Province in 2014. Bandung. [5]Tsegeye D, Belay B, Haile A. 2013. Morphological Characterization of Indigenous Hararghe Highland Goat Breed in Their Native Environment, West hararghe, Ethiopia. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research. 8(2):72-79. ISSN 1818-6785. IDOSI Publications.DOI:10.5829/idosi. aejsr.2013.8.2.7267. [6]Setiawati, E.N., D. M. Saleh and M.Y. Sumaryadi.2018. Reproductive Performance of Pasundan Cows in West Java. Proceedings of Livestock Technology and Agribusiness Seminar VI:Development of Genetic Resources of Local Livestock Towards AnimalFood Self-sufficiency ASUH, Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Jenderal Soedriman University, July 7, 2018. [7]Lake SL, Scholljegerdes EJ, Atkinson RL, Nayigihugu V, Paisley SI, Rule DC, Moss GE, Robinson TJ,Hess BW. 2005. Body Condition Score at Parturition and Postpartum Supplemental Fat Effects on Cow and Calf Performance. J Anim Sci. 83:2908-2917. [8]Affandy, L., P. Situmorang, P.W. Prihandini, D.B.Wijono and A. Rasyid. (2003). Performance of Reproduction and Management of Beef Cattle in small holder Conditions. Proceedings of the Seminar on Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Technology Innovation. Puslitbang Ranch, Bogor. [9]Yendraliza, B.P. Zespin, Z. Udin, and Jaswandi.2012. Post-partum Reproductive Appearance of Buffalo at Various Levels of GnRH and Synchronized with PGF2α. JITV. 17(2): 107-111. [10] Wawan, A., and Dewi. 2010. Theory and Measurement of Human Knowledge, Attitudes and Behavior Equipped with Sample Questionnaires. Yogyakarta:Nuha Medika. [11] Irawati. 2017. The Influence of Education, Training and Financial Compensation on the Performance of Extension Officers at the Muna District Forestry Service.http://download.portalgaruda.org/article.php?article. Journal of Management Science. Halu Oleo University, Kendari. Retrieved 11 August 2017.Vol 14 No 2, 2017. Pp267-271. [12] Setiawan, A., Dinasih, E., Zamanti, D., 2017. The use of progesterone preparations and the hormone GnRH in the determination of estrus in the superovulation program of limousine cows.Agricultural Journal.8(1): 8-16. [13] Iskandar. (2011). Performance of PO Cattle Reproduction in LowLand and Highlands in Jambi Province. Scientific Journal of Animal Husbandry Sciences, 14 (1): 51-61. [14] Fanani, S., Y.B.P.Subagyo and Lutojo. (2013). Reproduction Performance of Peranakan FriesianHolstein Cattle (PFH) in Pudak Subdistrict, Ponorogo Regency. Journal Tropical Animal Husbandry, 2 (1):21-27. [15] Hardjosubroto W, Astuti JM. 1993. Farm Smart Book. Jakarta. PT Gramedia Widiasarana. [16] Aslimah S, Yamin M, Astuti D. Apri. 2014. Productivity Of Rams Carcasses Garut Rams on Feeding Types and Different Times. Journal of Production Science. [17] Gunawan A, Sumantri C.2008. Estimating the value of phenotypic mixture and genetic distance of Garut sheep and their crosses. J.Indonesian Trop Anim Agric 3:176-185. [18] Utomo BN. 2015. Central Kalimantan Local Cow Katingan Cow and Its Conservation Efforts.Agriculture Litbang Journal. [19] Syukur SH, Afandi. 2009. The difference in feeding time in local bulls to income over feed cost. JAgrol and. 16(1): 72-77. [20] Soeharsono, R.A. Saptati, and K. Diwyanto. (2010).Reproduction Performance of Local Beef Cattle and Cattle Crossing Artificial Insemination Results in Special Region of Yogyakarta. National Seminar on Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Technology. pp.89-99. [21] Noor RR. 2008. Livestock Genetics. Jakarta (ID) Penebar Swadaya. [22] Novita, C.I., Sari, E.M. and E. Rahma. 2018. Characterization of Reproduction Appearance of Aceh Betina Cattle as Genetic Resources of Local Livestock in Subulussalam City. Agripet. 18(1): 36 -40. [23] Wibowo, F.C.P., N. Isnaini and S. Wahjuningsih.(2014). Performance of Reproduction of PO Cows and Peranakan Limousine Cows in Berbek Subdistrict, Nganjuk Regency. [24] Mabjeesh, S. J., C. Sabastian, O. Gal-Garber, and A.Shamay. 2013. Effect of photoperiod and heat stress in the third trimester of gestation on milk production and circulating hormones in dairy goats.Journal Of Dairy science.96; 189—197. http;//dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-25624. Diakses pada 07 November 2018. [25] Umiyasih,U and Anggraeny, Y. N. (2007). TechnicalGuidelines for Balanced Rationing,Feed Strategies in Beef Cattle, Research Reports, Center for Livestock Research and Development, AgriculturalResearch and Development Agency,Agricultural Department, Jakarta. [26] Chantalakhana, CH. and P. Skunmun, (2002). Sustainable Smallholder Animal Systems in the Tropics.Kasetsart University Press, Bangkok. [27] Muthalib, R.A. (2002). Study of Several Genetic and Non-Genetic Factors on The Productivity of PE Goats in Batanghari District of Jambi Province.Scientific Journal of Livestock Sciences. Vol.5(3).hlm. 112-119. [28] Putro, P. P. 2008. Dynamics of development of dominant follicles and corpus luteum after synchronization of estrus in Friesian Holstein Peranakan Cows.Postgraduate Dissertation. Gadjah Mada University,Yogyakarta. [29] Qisthon, A. and Y. Widodo. 2015. Effect of concentrate ratio density in Peranakan Ettawa goat rations in natural heat environments limited ration consumption, physiological response, and growth.JournalZootek. 35 (2); 351-360. [30] Nuryadi and Wahjuningsih, S. (2011). Reproduction Performance of Peranakan Ongole and Peranakan Limousin Cows in Malang Regency. Faculty of Animal Science, Brawijaya University,Malang. J. Ternak Tropika Vol 12, No. 1: 76-81. [31] Pramono, A., Kustono and H. Hartadi. (2008). Calving Interval Dairy Cows in Special Region of Yogyakarta Reviewed From Reproductive Performance.Buletin Peternakan 32(1): 38-50. [32] Susilawati, T. (2005). Success Rate of Orchards and Gender Accuracy resulting from Artificial Insemination Using Frozen Cement Sexing in Peranakan Ongole Cows. Journal Animal Production, 7 (3): 161-167. [33] Ihsan, M. N and S. Wahjuningsih. 2011. Appearance of beef cattle reproduction in Bojonegoro Regency. J.Ternak Tropika. 2 (2) : 76-80. [34] Apriyanto, D. 2005. Effect of Place Height And Parent Lactation Level on Service Per Conception (S/C)Of Friesian Holstein Peranakan Cows. Kab. Malang.Jawa Tengah. [35] Butler. W. R. 2005. Inhibition of Ovulation in the Postpartum Cow and the Lactating Sow. Liv.Prod.Sci. 98: 5-12. [36] Astuti M. (2004). Potential and Genetic Resource Of Peranakan Ongole Cows (PO).Wartazoa 14(3) : 98-106. [37] Hess, B.W., S.L. Lake., E.J. Scholljegerdes., T.R.Weston., V. Nayigihugu., J.D.C. Molle., G.E.Moss.2005. Nutritional Controls of Beef Cow Reproduction. J Anim Sci. 83:E90-E106. [38] Diskin, M.G and D.A. Kenny. 2014. Optimizing Reproductive Performance of Beef Cows and Replacement Heifers. Animal. 1:27-39. [39] Endrawati, E., E. Baliarti and S.P.S. Budi. 2010.Performans Of Simental-Peranakan Ongole Cross cow and Peranakan Ongole Cow Mother with Forage Feed And Concentrate. Bulletin Peternakan.34 (2):86-93. [40] Tjatur, A. N. K. and M. N. Ihsan. 2011. Reproductive Appearance of Friesian Holstein Dairy Cows (FH) on Various Parietas and Lactation Moons at Different Altitudes. Journal Ternak Tropika. 11: 1-1.