On the Context Vein of “Competence” and Its Generating Mechanism-Based on the Perspective of Situational Learning Theory

Source:
By:Jianjun Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/ret.v5i2.4704

Abstract: “Key competence” has become a hot vocabulary in educational reform in recent years. However, the essential connotation and specific generation mechanism of “competence” as its basic concept are still far from clear, and often controversial due to vague expressions. The rise of the concept of “key competence undoubtedly originated in the West, but in the context of Chinese, its meaning has changed significantly.By analyzing the origin and evolution of the concept of “competence” in the Western social context and the concept from “quality to“competence”in the Chinese social context, we can deeply understand the essence of the concept of “competence”and further clarify the specific generation mechanism of “competence” and its relationship with education. Analyzing the formation of competence based on situational learning theory emphasizes the occurrence of competence through participation in situational activities, the development of learning courses and identity consultation, which can provide some inspiration for the formation of competence. References:

[1] Bernstein, B., 2016. Education, symbol control and identification. People’s University of China Press. pp. 45. [2] Young, M.D.F., 2008. Bringing knowledge back——The turn of educational sociology from social constructivism to social realism. Educational Science Press. [3] OECD, 2022. Introduction to DeSeCo[EB/OL]. http://www.deseco.admin.ch/. [4] Rychen, D.S., 2009. Key Competencies: Overall Goals for Competence Development: An International and Interdisciplinary Perspective. In D. Maclean, Rupert and Wilson(Ed.), International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work. Netherlands: Springer, 2005: 2571-2583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5281-1_169 [5] OECD, 2005. The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive Summary[EB/OL]. Available online at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf. [6] Cai, Q.T., 2015. Key Competencies of National Basic Education Curriculum Reform in Taiwan in 12 Years. Shanghai Educational Research. (04), 5. [7] Chen, B.Zh., Zhang, X.R., Cai, Q.T., et al., 2007. All-round education research on national key competence. Tainan City: School of Management Education Research. [8] OECD, 2016. The Survey of Adult Skills: Reader’s Companion (Second Edition). Paris: OECD Publishing.pp. 97. [9] Hong Kong Education Bureau, 2022. Learning to learn——course development[EB/OL]. http://www.edb.gov.hk/tc/curriculum development/cs-curriculum-doc-report/wf-in-cur/index.html [10] Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. Opinions of the Ministry of Education on Deepening the Curriculum Reform in an All-round Way and Implementing the Fundamental Task of Moral Education[EB/OL]. http://old.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s7054/201404/167226.html. [11] Research Group on key competence, 2016. Key competencies and values for Chinese student devel opment. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education. (10), 1. [12] Liu, X.L., 2014. From “quality” to “key competence”——further inquiry about “what kind of person to cultivate”. Educational Science Research. (03), 10. [13] Lave, J., Wenger, E., 2004. Situational Learning: Legal Marginal Participation.Translation by Wang Wenjing.the east china normal university press. pp. 5. [14] Dewey, J., 2019. democracy and education. Beijing: People’s Education Press. pp. 21. [15] Chomsky, N., 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague, NE:Mouton. [16] Doll, W.E., 2012. Developing Competence. In Doll, W.E. Pragmatism, Post-Modernism, and Complexity Theory. Edited by Donna Trueit. New York: Routledge.67, 76. [17] Wenger, E., 2018. Community of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Jiangxi People’s Publishing House. pp. 143.